Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Gated Community Association Cannot Exclude LIG/EWS Allottees, Single Unified Society Mandatory: Telangana High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence

Income Tax Deductions Denied for Profit from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes, Supreme Court Rules

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgement, has held that profits derived from Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) and Duty Drawback Schemes are not eligible for deductions under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna delivered the verdict on April 10, 2023.

The court examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, including Section 28 and Section 80-IB. It noted that profits from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes fall under the category of incentives provided by the government or the Customs Act, and are therefore considered ancillary profits rather than profits derived directly from industrial undertakings.

The court referred to its earlier decisions in the cases of Liberty India and Sterling Foods, where a similar issue was considered. It upheld the reasoning in those cases, emphasizing that DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes are not related to the business of manufacturing or selling products but are export incentives. The court concluded that such incentives do not qualify as profits derived from industrial undertakings for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.

The court also distinguished the case of Meghalaya Steels Limited, which involved subsidies directly affecting the cost of manufacturing, stating that it was not applicable to the present scenario.

Supreme Court held that the respondent-assessee was not entitled to deductions under Section 80-IB on the profit earned from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes. It further clarified that any contrary decisions by other High Courts on this issue would no longer be considered valid.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2023

M/s. Saraf Exports VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-III     

Latest Legal News