Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court

Income Tax Deductions Denied for Profit from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes, Supreme Court Rules

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgement, has held that profits derived from Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) and Duty Drawback Schemes are not eligible for deductions under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna delivered the verdict on April 10, 2023.

The court examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, including Section 28 and Section 80-IB. It noted that profits from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes fall under the category of incentives provided by the government or the Customs Act, and are therefore considered ancillary profits rather than profits derived directly from industrial undertakings.

The court referred to its earlier decisions in the cases of Liberty India and Sterling Foods, where a similar issue was considered. It upheld the reasoning in those cases, emphasizing that DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes are not related to the business of manufacturing or selling products but are export incentives. The court concluded that such incentives do not qualify as profits derived from industrial undertakings for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.

The court also distinguished the case of Meghalaya Steels Limited, which involved subsidies directly affecting the cost of manufacturing, stating that it was not applicable to the present scenario.

Supreme Court held that the respondent-assessee was not entitled to deductions under Section 80-IB on the profit earned from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes. It further clarified that any contrary decisions by other High Courts on this issue would no longer be considered valid.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2023

M/s. Saraf Exports VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-III     

Latest Legal News