Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Income Tax Deductions Denied for Profit from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes, Supreme Court Rules

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgement, has held that profits derived from Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) and Duty Drawback Schemes are not eligible for deductions under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna delivered the verdict on April 10, 2023.

The court examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, including Section 28 and Section 80-IB. It noted that profits from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes fall under the category of incentives provided by the government or the Customs Act, and are therefore considered ancillary profits rather than profits derived directly from industrial undertakings.

The court referred to its earlier decisions in the cases of Liberty India and Sterling Foods, where a similar issue was considered. It upheld the reasoning in those cases, emphasizing that DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes are not related to the business of manufacturing or selling products but are export incentives. The court concluded that such incentives do not qualify as profits derived from industrial undertakings for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.

The court also distinguished the case of Meghalaya Steels Limited, which involved subsidies directly affecting the cost of manufacturing, stating that it was not applicable to the present scenario.

Supreme Court held that the respondent-assessee was not entitled to deductions under Section 80-IB on the profit earned from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes. It further clarified that any contrary decisions by other High Courts on this issue would no longer be considered valid.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2023

M/s. Saraf Exports VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-III     

Latest Legal News