Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Income Tax Deductions Denied for Profit from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes, Supreme Court Rules

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgement, has held that profits derived from Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) and Duty Drawback Schemes are not eligible for deductions under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna delivered the verdict on April 10, 2023.

The court examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, including Section 28 and Section 80-IB. It noted that profits from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes fall under the category of incentives provided by the government or the Customs Act, and are therefore considered ancillary profits rather than profits derived directly from industrial undertakings.

The court referred to its earlier decisions in the cases of Liberty India and Sterling Foods, where a similar issue was considered. It upheld the reasoning in those cases, emphasizing that DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes are not related to the business of manufacturing or selling products but are export incentives. The court concluded that such incentives do not qualify as profits derived from industrial undertakings for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.

The court also distinguished the case of Meghalaya Steels Limited, which involved subsidies directly affecting the cost of manufacturing, stating that it was not applicable to the present scenario.

Supreme Court held that the respondent-assessee was not entitled to deductions under Section 80-IB on the profit earned from DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes. It further clarified that any contrary decisions by other High Courts on this issue would no longer be considered valid.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2023

M/s. Saraf Exports VS Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-III     

Similar News