Appellate Court Must Re-Appreciate Evidence To Determine Lesser Offence Under Section 386 CrPC If Graver Charge Is Not Sustained: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Provisions Override Other Laws Including Principles Of Res Judicata: Supreme Court Right To Information Act | CCTV Footage Cannot Be Provided Directly To Applicant If It Falls Under Section 8(1)(g) Exemptions: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is The Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inefficient Case Management By State Law Officers Impedes Justice: Allahabad High Court Directs Principal Secretary (Law) To Reform Procedures Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is A Primary Consideration For Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings, But Virtual Appearance Can Mitigate Hardship: Andhra Pradesh High Court Son Cannot Claim Co-Ownership Or Resist Eviction Based On Alleged Financial Contribution To Property Purchased In Mother’s Name: Delhi High Court Order 33 Rule 1 CPC | Applicant Must Prove Inability To Pay Court Fee With Cogent Evidence; Mere Assertion Of Indigence Is Insufficient: Chhattisgarh High Court Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right To Possession, Cannot Rely Solely On Lacunae In Defendant’s Evidence: Delhi High Court Successor Cannot Remain Silent: Bombay High Court Upholds Tenant's Right To Purchase Agricultural Land, Rules Rejection Before 1961 Amendment No Bar Single Mother Has Right To Determine Child’s Surname And Alter Biological Father's Name In Birth Certificate: Calcutta High Court Court Can Sanction Professional Fees Of Valuers Exceeding Prescribed Ceiling Post-Assignment: Bombay High Court MACT | Appellate Court Can Reduce Compensation Even If Insurer’s Appeal Challenges Quantum While Claimant Seeks Enhancement: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Written Statement To Correct Internal Inconsistencies Does Not Amount To Withdrawal Of Admission: Delhi High Court Oral Family Partition Valid Even If Unregistered: Jharkhand High Court Power Of Attorney Lacking Explicit Interest Is Revocable Regardless Of 'Irrevocable' Label: Gujarat High Court DRC Act | Summary Eviction Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Extended Litigation By Seeking To File Additional Documents Post-Pleadings: Delhi High Court Financial Institutions Cannot Use 'Goonda-ism' For Repossession: Supreme Court Mandates Compensation For Violation Of Article 21 Motor Vehicles Act: Claimant Cannot Invoke Jurisdiction Of A Forum Where Neither Accident Occurred Nor Defendant Resides: Supreme Court Article 226 | Writ Court Cannot Decide Title Disputes Or Protect Possession If Factual Matrix Is Disputed: Supreme Court Suppression Of Material Facts In Writ Petition Under Article 32 Renders Challenge Non-Maintainable: Supreme Court

Inaction of Punjab and Haryana Bar Council Undermines Rule of Law’ in Misconduct Probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Expedited Investigation into Allegations of Assault, Embezzlement, and Sexual Harassment Against Bar Members

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana to expedite the investigation into serious allegations of misconduct, including embezzlement, assault, and sexual harassment, against its members. The court, presided over by Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, underscored the urgency of addressing these issues to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.

The case, CWP-PIL-100-2024, was filed by Anjali Kukar and others against the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and other respondents. The petitioners alleged inaction on the part of the Bar Council regarding complaints of financial mismanagement and assault by some of its members. Notably, an incident involving the assault of petitioner No. 3, Shri Ranjeet Singh, led to the lodging of FIR No. 72 dated 01.07.2024. The FIR detailed the physical assault on Singh by respondent No. 2 and his associates at the High Court premises, prompting a wider probe into their conduct.

The court expressed dissatisfaction with the Bar Council’s delay in addressing the complaints against respondents No. 2 and 3. The petitioners had accused these individuals of defalcating and embezzling funds, and failing to provide monthly financial statements as required. The Bar Council’s counsel acknowledged that the complaint was under consideration and promised further action in compliance with the Advocates Act, 1961.

The court took a strong view of the assault on petitioner No. 3. Referring to the lodged FIR, the bench noted the need for thorough supervision by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to ensure comprehensive investigation. “We are of the considered opinion that this action of respondent No. 2 and his assaulting petitioner No. 3 amounts to interference in the administration of justice and prima facie a case of criminal contempt is made out,” the court stated.

In a serious development, multiple complaints of sexual harassment against respondent No. 2 were brought to the court’s attention. These complaints, filed by lady advocates and employees of the Bar Association, are now to be investigated by the Bar Council as directed by the High Court. The court emphasized the duty to maintain the institution’s prestige, indicating severe consequences for non-cooperation by the accused.

The judgment highlighted the importance of swift and decisive action in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession. The court drew on established legal precedents, including the Supreme Court rulings in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India and M/s PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, underscoring the illegality of strikes by Bar Association members.

The bench remarked, “The inaction of the Bar Council in dealing with serious allegations of misconduct not only undermines the rule of law but also erodes public confidence in the legal system. The gravity of the allegations necessitates immediate and thorough investigation.”

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s directive to expedite the investigation into the allegations against Bar Council members marks a crucial step in upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession. By addressing the issues of assault, financial mismanagement, and sexual harassment, the court aims to reinforce the sanctity and respect of the legal institution. The outcome of the Bar Council’s inquiry, due within ten days, is awaited with significant interest, as it will likely have far-reaching implications for the governance and accountability within the legal fraternity.

 

Date of Decision: July 3, 2024

Anjali Kukar and others vs. Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and others

 

Latest Legal News