Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Inaction of Punjab and Haryana Bar Council Undermines Rule of Law’ in Misconduct Probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Expedited Investigation into Allegations of Assault, Embezzlement, and Sexual Harassment Against Bar Members

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana to expedite the investigation into serious allegations of misconduct, including embezzlement, assault, and sexual harassment, against its members. The court, presided over by Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, underscored the urgency of addressing these issues to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.

The case, CWP-PIL-100-2024, was filed by Anjali Kukar and others against the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and other respondents. The petitioners alleged inaction on the part of the Bar Council regarding complaints of financial mismanagement and assault by some of its members. Notably, an incident involving the assault of petitioner No. 3, Shri Ranjeet Singh, led to the lodging of FIR No. 72 dated 01.07.2024. The FIR detailed the physical assault on Singh by respondent No. 2 and his associates at the High Court premises, prompting a wider probe into their conduct.

The court expressed dissatisfaction with the Bar Council’s delay in addressing the complaints against respondents No. 2 and 3. The petitioners had accused these individuals of defalcating and embezzling funds, and failing to provide monthly financial statements as required. The Bar Council’s counsel acknowledged that the complaint was under consideration and promised further action in compliance with the Advocates Act, 1961.

The court took a strong view of the assault on petitioner No. 3. Referring to the lodged FIR, the bench noted the need for thorough supervision by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to ensure comprehensive investigation. “We are of the considered opinion that this action of respondent No. 2 and his assaulting petitioner No. 3 amounts to interference in the administration of justice and prima facie a case of criminal contempt is made out,” the court stated.

In a serious development, multiple complaints of sexual harassment against respondent No. 2 were brought to the court’s attention. These complaints, filed by lady advocates and employees of the Bar Association, are now to be investigated by the Bar Council as directed by the High Court. The court emphasized the duty to maintain the institution’s prestige, indicating severe consequences for non-cooperation by the accused.

The judgment highlighted the importance of swift and decisive action in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession. The court drew on established legal precedents, including the Supreme Court rulings in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India and M/s PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, underscoring the illegality of strikes by Bar Association members.

The bench remarked, “The inaction of the Bar Council in dealing with serious allegations of misconduct not only undermines the rule of law but also erodes public confidence in the legal system. The gravity of the allegations necessitates immediate and thorough investigation.”

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s directive to expedite the investigation into the allegations against Bar Council members marks a crucial step in upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession. By addressing the issues of assault, financial mismanagement, and sexual harassment, the court aims to reinforce the sanctity and respect of the legal institution. The outcome of the Bar Council’s inquiry, due within ten days, is awaited with significant interest, as it will likely have far-reaching implications for the governance and accountability within the legal fraternity.

 

Date of Decision: July 3, 2024

Anjali Kukar and others vs. Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and others

 

Latest Legal News