Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Inaction of Punjab and Haryana Bar Council Undermines Rule of Law’ in Misconduct Probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders Expedited Investigation into Allegations of Assault, Embezzlement, and Sexual Harassment Against Bar Members

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana to expedite the investigation into serious allegations of misconduct, including embezzlement, assault, and sexual harassment, against its members. The court, presided over by Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, underscored the urgency of addressing these issues to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.

The case, CWP-PIL-100-2024, was filed by Anjali Kukar and others against the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and other respondents. The petitioners alleged inaction on the part of the Bar Council regarding complaints of financial mismanagement and assault by some of its members. Notably, an incident involving the assault of petitioner No. 3, Shri Ranjeet Singh, led to the lodging of FIR No. 72 dated 01.07.2024. The FIR detailed the physical assault on Singh by respondent No. 2 and his associates at the High Court premises, prompting a wider probe into their conduct.

The court expressed dissatisfaction with the Bar Council’s delay in addressing the complaints against respondents No. 2 and 3. The petitioners had accused these individuals of defalcating and embezzling funds, and failing to provide monthly financial statements as required. The Bar Council’s counsel acknowledged that the complaint was under consideration and promised further action in compliance with the Advocates Act, 1961.

The court took a strong view of the assault on petitioner No. 3. Referring to the lodged FIR, the bench noted the need for thorough supervision by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to ensure comprehensive investigation. “We are of the considered opinion that this action of respondent No. 2 and his assaulting petitioner No. 3 amounts to interference in the administration of justice and prima facie a case of criminal contempt is made out,” the court stated.

In a serious development, multiple complaints of sexual harassment against respondent No. 2 were brought to the court’s attention. These complaints, filed by lady advocates and employees of the Bar Association, are now to be investigated by the Bar Council as directed by the High Court. The court emphasized the duty to maintain the institution’s prestige, indicating severe consequences for non-cooperation by the accused.

The judgment highlighted the importance of swift and decisive action in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession. The court drew on established legal precedents, including the Supreme Court rulings in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India and M/s PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, underscoring the illegality of strikes by Bar Association members.

The bench remarked, “The inaction of the Bar Council in dealing with serious allegations of misconduct not only undermines the rule of law but also erodes public confidence in the legal system. The gravity of the allegations necessitates immediate and thorough investigation.”

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s directive to expedite the investigation into the allegations against Bar Council members marks a crucial step in upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession. By addressing the issues of assault, financial mismanagement, and sexual harassment, the court aims to reinforce the sanctity and respect of the legal institution. The outcome of the Bar Council’s inquiry, due within ten days, is awaited with significant interest, as it will likely have far-reaching implications for the governance and accountability within the legal fraternity.

 

Date of Decision: July 3, 2024

Anjali Kukar and others vs. Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana through its Chairman and others

 

Similar News