-
by sayum
09 January 2026 9:28 AM
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal, allowed an appeal against the decision of the High Court, leading to the quashing of an FIR and charge sheet in a case of alleged fuel adulteration. The apex court’s decision in Criminal Appeal No. 3512 of 2023 marks a critical point in legal proceedings concerning evidence evaluation and procedural compliance.
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, stated, “In the absence of the report, taking the charge sheet as it is, no material is placed on record to show that the liquid in the tanker was neither diesel nor petrol but a mixture of hydrocarbons.” This observation was pivotal in the decision to quash the FIR against the appellants, Suresh & Others, who were accused of selling adulterated fuel.
The appellants were charged under Sections 420, 120-B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, for allegedly adulterating fuel with hydrocarbons. The prosecution’s case hinged on the assertion that the seized liquid from the appellants’ tanker was not genuine petrol or diesel but a hydrocarbon mixture. However, the defense highlighted the lack of a conclusive expert report affirming this claim.
The Court meticulously reviewed the evidence presented in the charge sheet and FIR. It noted the significant delay in obtaining an expert report on the nature of the liquid seized. The Court also considered a report from BPCL Quality Assurance Laboratory, which confirmed that the samples conformed to specifications, and this piece of evidence was not effectively countered by the prosecution.
This ruling underscores the necessity for conclusive evidence and timely procedural actions in criminal prosecutions. The judgment emphasizes the importance of having substantial material on record to justify the continuation of legal proceedings against accused individuals.
Date of Decision: 24th November 2023
Suresh & Ors. VS State of Madhya Pradesh
