Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

In a democratic set up, the will of the majority has to prevail :SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

The District Collector, Ahmednagar, vide order dated 8.3.2017, recorded in Form (4) as per Rule 5 (1) of the Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as' the said Rules') about the registration of the Aghadi. A unanimous resolution was passed to remove the appellant from the post of Party Leader of the INCPS Party. It was also resolved to appoint respondent No.3 as Party Leader/Party Whip. She was also authorized to submit a proposal to the District Collector, Ahmednagar. The members of the INCPS Party voted against the appellant in the election for the post of Chairman (Sabhapati) that was held on 7.1.2020. On account of the support of the members belonging to other parties, the appellant came to be elected in the said election. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. 

SEPTEMBER 01, 2021 

SAU. SANGEETA W/O SUNIL SHINDE  VERSUS  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 9:21 AM
Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court
  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 9:20 AM
Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case
  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 7:16 AM
Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court
  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 7:16 AM
High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court
  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 5:22 AM
MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court
  • by sayum
    19 June 2026 5:22 AM
Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court