Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

"High Court Sets Precedent for Timely Witness Appearances and Upholds Right to Liberty in Landmark Ruling"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court issued a directive to enforce the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) aimed at ensuring the timely appearance of prosecution witnesses during trials. The court’s attention was drawn to concerns about delays in trials and the extended incarceration of undertrials due to alleged non-compliance with mandatory provisions.

The Bench emphasized the need for strict adherence to the SOP and called for action against officials who fail to appear as witnesses. The court’s order also outlined the circulation of circulars to enhance the administration of criminal justice, underscoring the importance of efficient trial proceedings.

The ruling further addressed a bail petition related to a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case. The petitioner alleged false implication and lack of compliance with NDPS Act provisions. Despite four dismissed bail petitions, the court noted the slow progress of the trial, with charges framed and the majority of prosecution witnesses already examined.

Citing the petitioner’s non-violent offense and the absence of evidence tampering concerns, the court granted bail with additional conditions, highlighting the petitioner’s right to liberty.

This ruling emphasizes the court’s commitment to upholding the rights of undertrials and ensuring the timely dispensation of justice. The decision sets a precedent for the strict enforcement of procedural guidelines and the accountability of officials responsible for witness appearance.                                          Date of decision: 28.08.2023

Jagjit Singh @ Jaggi  vs State of Punjab        

Latest Legal News