Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

“High Court Quashes FIR Alleging Sexual Harassment, Citing ‘Abuse of Process of Law’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court recently quashed a First Information Report (FIR) filed against Mr. Vijay Choudhary, Vice President of Human Resources at Max New York Life Insurance. The judgment, pronounced by Justices A. S. Gadkari and Shivkumar Dige on August 11th, 2023, emphasized the importance of upholding justice and safeguarding the legal process.

The FIR, lodged by Mrs. Hetal Desai, an employee at the company, alleged instances of sexual harassment and misconduct. However, the High Court found several irregularities and inconsistencies in the complaint, leading to the conclusion that the FIR was filed with a “mala fide intention” and amounted to an “abuse of process of law.”

Justice A. S. Gadkari, in the judgment, remarked, “The continuation of further investigation in the FIR lodged by the Respondent No.2 would be sheer abuse of process of law and needs to be quashed in the interest of justice.” The Court referred to established legal principles and relevant case law to arrive at this conclusion.

The Court’s decision highlighted the importance of prompt and accurate reporting in criminal cases. Referring to an observation from the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Thulia Kali v. The State of Tamil Nadu, the High Court noted, “Delay in lodging the first information report quite often results in embellishment which is a creature of afterthought. On account of delay, the report not only gets bereft of the advantage of spontaneity, danger creeps in of the introduction of coloured version, exaggerated account, or concocted story as a result of deliberation and consultation.”

Additionally, the judgment referred to the principles set out in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. V. Bhajan Lal & Ors., which outlines categories of cases where the court’s extraordinary powers can be exercised to prevent abuse of the legal process.

This verdict not only sheds light on the intricacies of quashing FIRs but also underscores the importance of safeguarding the legal system from misuse and manipulation. The Court’s keen focus on transparency, fairness, and adherence to due process sets a significant precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: 11th August, 2023

Mr. Vijay Choudhary vs State Of Maharashtra High

Latest Legal News