Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

“High Court Quashes FIR Alleging Sexual Harassment, Citing ‘Abuse of Process of Law’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court recently quashed a First Information Report (FIR) filed against Mr. Vijay Choudhary, Vice President of Human Resources at Max New York Life Insurance. The judgment, pronounced by Justices A. S. Gadkari and Shivkumar Dige on August 11th, 2023, emphasized the importance of upholding justice and safeguarding the legal process.

The FIR, lodged by Mrs. Hetal Desai, an employee at the company, alleged instances of sexual harassment and misconduct. However, the High Court found several irregularities and inconsistencies in the complaint, leading to the conclusion that the FIR was filed with a “mala fide intention” and amounted to an “abuse of process of law.”

Justice A. S. Gadkari, in the judgment, remarked, “The continuation of further investigation in the FIR lodged by the Respondent No.2 would be sheer abuse of process of law and needs to be quashed in the interest of justice.” The Court referred to established legal principles and relevant case law to arrive at this conclusion.

The Court’s decision highlighted the importance of prompt and accurate reporting in criminal cases. Referring to an observation from the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Thulia Kali v. The State of Tamil Nadu, the High Court noted, “Delay in lodging the first information report quite often results in embellishment which is a creature of afterthought. On account of delay, the report not only gets bereft of the advantage of spontaneity, danger creeps in of the introduction of coloured version, exaggerated account, or concocted story as a result of deliberation and consultation.”

Additionally, the judgment referred to the principles set out in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. V. Bhajan Lal & Ors., which outlines categories of cases where the court’s extraordinary powers can be exercised to prevent abuse of the legal process.

This verdict not only sheds light on the intricacies of quashing FIRs but also underscores the importance of safeguarding the legal system from misuse and manipulation. The Court’s keen focus on transparency, fairness, and adherence to due process sets a significant precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: 11th August, 2023

Mr. Vijay Choudhary vs State Of Maharashtra High

Latest Legal News