Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

“High Court Quashes FIR Alleging Sexual Harassment, Citing ‘Abuse of Process of Law’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court recently quashed a First Information Report (FIR) filed against Mr. Vijay Choudhary, Vice President of Human Resources at Max New York Life Insurance. The judgment, pronounced by Justices A. S. Gadkari and Shivkumar Dige on August 11th, 2023, emphasized the importance of upholding justice and safeguarding the legal process.

The FIR, lodged by Mrs. Hetal Desai, an employee at the company, alleged instances of sexual harassment and misconduct. However, the High Court found several irregularities and inconsistencies in the complaint, leading to the conclusion that the FIR was filed with a “mala fide intention” and amounted to an “abuse of process of law.”

Justice A. S. Gadkari, in the judgment, remarked, “The continuation of further investigation in the FIR lodged by the Respondent No.2 would be sheer abuse of process of law and needs to be quashed in the interest of justice.” The Court referred to established legal principles and relevant case law to arrive at this conclusion.

The Court’s decision highlighted the importance of prompt and accurate reporting in criminal cases. Referring to an observation from the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Thulia Kali v. The State of Tamil Nadu, the High Court noted, “Delay in lodging the first information report quite often results in embellishment which is a creature of afterthought. On account of delay, the report not only gets bereft of the advantage of spontaneity, danger creeps in of the introduction of coloured version, exaggerated account, or concocted story as a result of deliberation and consultation.”

Additionally, the judgment referred to the principles set out in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. V. Bhajan Lal & Ors., which outlines categories of cases where the court’s extraordinary powers can be exercised to prevent abuse of the legal process.

This verdict not only sheds light on the intricacies of quashing FIRs but also underscores the importance of safeguarding the legal system from misuse and manipulation. The Court’s keen focus on transparency, fairness, and adherence to due process sets a significant precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: 11th August, 2023

Mr. Vijay Choudhary vs State Of Maharashtra High

Latest Legal News