Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against National-Level Shooter, Cites Lack of Prima Facie Case”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court has quashed a criminal complaint filed against Disha Langan, a national-level shooter and law student, under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) and (b) of The Customs Act, 1962. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee on August 18, 2023, has attracted attention for its meticulous examination of the case and its implications.

The petitioner, Disha Langan, had challenged the summoning order Issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, which was based on allegations of smuggling arms and ammunition. The court’s observations highlighted the uniqueness of the case, where the petitioner’s license was used by her father for importing firearms from Slovenia. The judgment underscored the importance of carefully considering the sufficiency of grounds for issuing summons, stating that the court should not proceed mechanically in such matters.

“Execution of law without appropriate acquaintance with legal provisions and comprehensive sense of their application may result in an innocent being prosecuted,” the court observed, emphasizing the serious consequences that a summoning order carries. It noted that the case against Disha Langan was based on assumptions and presumptions, which were not sufficient to sustain the allegations.

The court's decision also delved Into the concept of vicarious liability under criminal law, asserting that such liability was impermissible. It highlighted that the petitioner, a bright young woman of 26 years, should not be held responsible for her father’s actions solely based on the use of her license.

The judgment, which discussed sections of The Customs Act, 1962, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and various legal precedents, ultimately concluded that there was no prima facie case against the petitioner. The court quashed the criminal complaint against Disha Langan, allowing her to continue pursuing her studies and shooting aspirations without the shadow of alleged offences.

This ruling not only provides relief to Disha Langan but also reiterates the need for a balanced and thoughtful approach in summoning orders, recognizing the potential consequences they entail.

Date of Decision:   August 18, 2023 

DISHA LANGAN vs  DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE  

Latest Legal News