Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

“High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against National-Level Shooter, Cites Lack of Prima Facie Case”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court has quashed a criminal complaint filed against Disha Langan, a national-level shooter and law student, under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) and (b) of The Customs Act, 1962. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee on August 18, 2023, has attracted attention for its meticulous examination of the case and its implications.

The petitioner, Disha Langan, had challenged the summoning order Issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, which was based on allegations of smuggling arms and ammunition. The court’s observations highlighted the uniqueness of the case, where the petitioner’s license was used by her father for importing firearms from Slovenia. The judgment underscored the importance of carefully considering the sufficiency of grounds for issuing summons, stating that the court should not proceed mechanically in such matters.

“Execution of law without appropriate acquaintance with legal provisions and comprehensive sense of their application may result in an innocent being prosecuted,” the court observed, emphasizing the serious consequences that a summoning order carries. It noted that the case against Disha Langan was based on assumptions and presumptions, which were not sufficient to sustain the allegations.

The court's decision also delved Into the concept of vicarious liability under criminal law, asserting that such liability was impermissible. It highlighted that the petitioner, a bright young woman of 26 years, should not be held responsible for her father’s actions solely based on the use of her license.

The judgment, which discussed sections of The Customs Act, 1962, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and various legal precedents, ultimately concluded that there was no prima facie case against the petitioner. The court quashed the criminal complaint against Disha Langan, allowing her to continue pursuing her studies and shooting aspirations without the shadow of alleged offences.

This ruling not only provides relief to Disha Langan but also reiterates the need for a balanced and thoughtful approach in summoning orders, recognizing the potential consequences they entail.

Date of Decision:   August 18, 2023 

DISHA LANGAN vs  DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE  

Similar News