MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court of Punjab & Haryana Grants Bail in Intriguing Case of Fabricated Injury

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen, implicated in a case involving fabricated injury and conspiracy. The case, initially registered under grave charges including Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) of the IPC, later saw a dramatic turn with the revelation of a fabricated firearm injury.

"The Veracity of the Prosecution Case... Shall be Adjudicated Upon During the Course of the Trial"

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, remarked on the complexity of the case, highlighting the evolving nature of the evidence and the charges against the accused. The judge's observation serves as a reminder of the judicial process's commitment to fairness and the principle of innocent until proven guilty.

The FIR, lodged at Police Station Hodal, District Palwal, Haryana, originally accused several individuals of a violent attack. However, subsequent investigations revealed a plot to falsely implicate certain individuals, leading to a reshuffling of charges and accused. The petitioner, Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen, not initially named in the FIR, was later implicated based on co-accused disclosure statements.

Justice Bedi, acknowledging the prolonged custody of the petitioner since May 24, 2022, and the slow pace of the trial with only one of the nineteen prosecution witnesses examined so far, granted bail. This decision was also influenced by the fact that several co-accused had already been granted bail. The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate.

The court imposed specific conditions for the grant of bail, including the petitioner's monthly appearance at the concerned police station and the creation of a Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs. 1,00,000, which would be forfeited in case of non-compliance with court orders.

This case sets a significant precedent in dealing with cases where the nature of allegations and the accused's roles evolve over time. The court's balanced approach, considering both the seriousness of the charges and the rights of the accused, reflects the intricate nature of judicial decision-making in the criminal justice system.

Date of Decision: 17th November 2023

Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen VS State of Haryana.

Latest Legal News