Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

High Court of Punjab & Haryana Grants Bail in Intriguing Case of Fabricated Injury

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen, implicated in a case involving fabricated injury and conspiracy. The case, initially registered under grave charges including Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) of the IPC, later saw a dramatic turn with the revelation of a fabricated firearm injury.

"The Veracity of the Prosecution Case... Shall be Adjudicated Upon During the Course of the Trial"

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, remarked on the complexity of the case, highlighting the evolving nature of the evidence and the charges against the accused. The judge's observation serves as a reminder of the judicial process's commitment to fairness and the principle of innocent until proven guilty.

The FIR, lodged at Police Station Hodal, District Palwal, Haryana, originally accused several individuals of a violent attack. However, subsequent investigations revealed a plot to falsely implicate certain individuals, leading to a reshuffling of charges and accused. The petitioner, Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen, not initially named in the FIR, was later implicated based on co-accused disclosure statements.

Justice Bedi, acknowledging the prolonged custody of the petitioner since May 24, 2022, and the slow pace of the trial with only one of the nineteen prosecution witnesses examined so far, granted bail. This decision was also influenced by the fact that several co-accused had already been granted bail. The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate.

The court imposed specific conditions for the grant of bail, including the petitioner's monthly appearance at the concerned police station and the creation of a Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs. 1,00,000, which would be forfeited in case of non-compliance with court orders.

This case sets a significant precedent in dealing with cases where the nature of allegations and the accused's roles evolve over time. The court's balanced approach, considering both the seriousness of the charges and the rights of the accused, reflects the intricate nature of judicial decision-making in the criminal justice system.

Date of Decision: 17th November 2023

Pawan @ Khunta @ Praveen VS State of Haryana.

Latest Legal News