Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

High Court Acquits Director in Cheque Dishonor Case: Emphasizes Mandatory Inclusion of Company as Accused for Case Maintainability

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court at Calcutta has set a precedent in cases of cheque dishonor under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) acquitted Ravi Modi, director of Bhavyaa Global Limited, in a cheque dishonor case, emphasizing the legal necessity of including the company as an accused for the maintainability of such cases.

The case, titled Ravi Modi Vs Shashi Kant Bubna & Anr., revolved around the dishonor of a cheque issued by Mr. Modi, the director of Bhavyaa Global Limited. The High Court overturned the previous convictions by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the Additional District & Sessions Judge, which had sentenced Mr. Modi to imprisonment and imposed a compensation of Rs. 17,00,000.

In her judgment dated December 1, 2023, Justice Dutt (Paul) stated, “in the absence of the company being arraigned as an accused, a complaint against the petitioner is not maintainable.” This statement highlights the court’s adherence to the legal framework under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which requires the company to be included as an accused if the cheque is issued by a company director.

The court relied heavily on precedents set by the Supreme Court in cases such as Aneeta Hada vs Godfather Travels and Tours Private Limited and Himanshu -versus- B. Shivamurthy & Another. These cases underscore the imperative to arraign the concerned company in cases of cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Date of Decision: 1st December 2023

Ravi Modi Vs Shashi Kant Bubna & Anr.

Latest Legal News