Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Hasty Trial Deprived Accused of Fair Trial in Rape-Murder Case – Denovo Trial: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the conviction and sentence of an appellant in a harrowing rape and murder case, citing that a hasty trial deprived the accused of a fair opportunity to defend himself. The case, which had attracted national attention, involved the rape and murder of a three-month-old girl child.

The judgment, delivered by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the critical importance of ensuring a fair trial in criminal cases and highlighted the detrimental effects of rushed proceedings on the accused's right to a robust defense. Justice Mishra stated, "The trial was conducted in a hurried manner without providing ample and proper opportunity to the defense counsel, who was engaged through legal aid, to prepare himself effectively."

The court found that the trial had proceeded on a day-to-day basis, with witnesses being produced without issuing summons, leaving limited time for the defense to prepare adequately. Furthermore, the accused was not given the opportunity to engage a counsel of his choice and had to rely on a legal aid counsel. The judgment noted that even expert reports, including DNA evidence, were presented late during the trial, hindering the accused's ability to challenge them effectively.

Justice Mishra cited previous judgments and principles emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial trial, stating, "A fair trial means a trial in which bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause being tried is eliminated." The judgment also underscored the importance of a trial judge exuding an aura of tranquility and providing sufficient time for preparation.

In light of these observations, the Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and the High Court, and the matter has been remitted back to the trial court for a de novo trial. The court has directed the trial court and the District Legal Services Authority to provide the appellant with the assistance of a senior counsel to ensure a fair and just trial.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the crucial role that a fair trial plays in upholding the principles of justice, even in cases that evoke strong emotions and public outrage.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

NAVEEN @ AJAY  vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Similar News