Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Hasty Trial Deprived Accused of Fair Trial in Rape-Murder Case – Denovo Trial: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the conviction and sentence of an appellant in a harrowing rape and murder case, citing that a hasty trial deprived the accused of a fair opportunity to defend himself. The case, which had attracted national attention, involved the rape and murder of a three-month-old girl child.

The judgment, delivered by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the critical importance of ensuring a fair trial in criminal cases and highlighted the detrimental effects of rushed proceedings on the accused's right to a robust defense. Justice Mishra stated, "The trial was conducted in a hurried manner without providing ample and proper opportunity to the defense counsel, who was engaged through legal aid, to prepare himself effectively."

The court found that the trial had proceeded on a day-to-day basis, with witnesses being produced without issuing summons, leaving limited time for the defense to prepare adequately. Furthermore, the accused was not given the opportunity to engage a counsel of his choice and had to rely on a legal aid counsel. The judgment noted that even expert reports, including DNA evidence, were presented late during the trial, hindering the accused's ability to challenge them effectively.

Justice Mishra cited previous judgments and principles emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial trial, stating, "A fair trial means a trial in which bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause being tried is eliminated." The judgment also underscored the importance of a trial judge exuding an aura of tranquility and providing sufficient time for preparation.

In light of these observations, the Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and the High Court, and the matter has been remitted back to the trial court for a de novo trial. The court has directed the trial court and the District Legal Services Authority to provide the appellant with the assistance of a senior counsel to ensure a fair and just trial.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the crucial role that a fair trial plays in upholding the principles of justice, even in cases that evoke strong emotions and public outrage.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

NAVEEN @ AJAY  vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Latest Legal News