Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Hasty Trial Deprived Accused of Fair Trial in Rape-Murder Case – Denovo Trial: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the conviction and sentence of an appellant in a harrowing rape and murder case, citing that a hasty trial deprived the accused of a fair opportunity to defend himself. The case, which had attracted national attention, involved the rape and murder of a three-month-old girl child.

The judgment, delivered by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the critical importance of ensuring a fair trial in criminal cases and highlighted the detrimental effects of rushed proceedings on the accused's right to a robust defense. Justice Mishra stated, "The trial was conducted in a hurried manner without providing ample and proper opportunity to the defense counsel, who was engaged through legal aid, to prepare himself effectively."

The court found that the trial had proceeded on a day-to-day basis, with witnesses being produced without issuing summons, leaving limited time for the defense to prepare adequately. Furthermore, the accused was not given the opportunity to engage a counsel of his choice and had to rely on a legal aid counsel. The judgment noted that even expert reports, including DNA evidence, were presented late during the trial, hindering the accused's ability to challenge them effectively.

Justice Mishra cited previous judgments and principles emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial trial, stating, "A fair trial means a trial in which bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause being tried is eliminated." The judgment also underscored the importance of a trial judge exuding an aura of tranquility and providing sufficient time for preparation.

In light of these observations, the Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and the High Court, and the matter has been remitted back to the trial court for a de novo trial. The court has directed the trial court and the District Legal Services Authority to provide the appellant with the assistance of a senior counsel to ensure a fair and just trial.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the crucial role that a fair trial plays in upholding the principles of justice, even in cases that evoke strong emotions and public outrage.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

NAVEEN @ AJAY  vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Similar News