Failure To Collect Electronic Evidence Such As Call Detail Records In Offences Under Section 354 IPC Can Prove Fatal To Prosecution Case: Telangana High Court Mere Pendency Of Challenge To Sale Certificate Before DRT Does Not Bar Mutation Under OSS Rules: Orissa High Court Court May Impose Conditions On Minor’s Custody In Habeas Corpus Proceedings To Protect Best Interest Of Child: Madhya Pradesh High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Cannot Be Rejected For Lack Of Specific Particulars Or Res Judicata At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Surprise Check Without Prior FIR Registration Casts Doubt On Foundational Facts; Uncorroborated Approver Evidence Tainted: Madras High Court Acquits Former Protector Of Emigrants Appointment Of Lambardar | Appellate Authority Remanding Matter Must Not Pre-Judge Merits Of Candidates: Punjab & Haryana High Court Disciplinary Proceedings | Subsequent Deposit Of Embezzled Amount Does Not Exonerate Employee Or Efface Misconduct: Rajasthan High Court Order XXI Rule 37 CPC | Willful Evasion Of Decretal Debt Despite Having Means Justifies Arrest And Detention: Telangana High Court Claims For Recovery Of Stridhan Must Be Substantiated By Cogent Evidence, Not Merely Oral Assertion: Kerala High Court Concurrent Findings Of Fact Regarding Unproved Oral Family Settlement Cannot Be Re-Appreciated In Second Appeal: Punjab And Haryana High Court Limitation Act | Governmental Bureaucratic Delays Without Acceptable Explanation Cannot Be A Ground For Condoning Delay Under Section 5: Telangana High Court Constitutional Courts Should Refrain From Fixing Time-Bound Schedules For Disposal Of Cases In Lower Courts: Jharkhand High Court Industrial Tribunal Cannot Bypass Adjudication Of Domestic Enquiry Validity In Termination Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 106 Indian Evidence Act Cannot Shift Burden To Accused Unless Prosecution Establishes A Prima Facie Case: Allahabad High Court NDPS Act | Criminal Antecedents And Stage Of Investigation Are Decisive Factors For Grant Of Bail Under Section 480 BNSS: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cannot Dismember An Existing Factory: Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Notices To Acquire Private Land Under Section 299 MMC Act Order 21 Rule 32 CPC | Proof Of Violation By Way Of Expert Evidence Regarding Age Of Construction Is Mandatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 34 Arbitration And Conciliation Act | Court Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence, But Award Lacking Reasoning And Basis Is Patently Illegal: Calcutta High Court Section 175(3) & (4) BNSS | Magistrate Cannot Pass Mechanical Orders For FIR Registration Against Public Servants Without Complying With Statutory Safeguards: Allahabad High Court Section 69 Indian Succession Act | Provision For Automatic Revocation Of Will Upon Marriage Is Not Violative Of Article 14 Or 15 Of The Constitution: Kerala High Court Unilateral Cancellation Of Registered Gift Deed Without Civil Court Decree Is Void Ab-Initio: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inter-District Transfer Of Teachers Cannot Be Claimed As A Matter Of Right By Jeopardizing Student-Teacher Ratio: Supreme Court Judicial Misconduct | Threatening To Sleep On Pavement To Demand Official Accommodation Constitutes Grave Misconduct Disentitling A Judge From Service: Gujarat High Court Guardians And Wards Act | Father’s Declaration Of Having ‘No Children’ In Matrimonial Profile Disentitles Him To Custody: Madras High Court NDPS Act | Failure To Comply With Section 52A And Unexplained Delay In Forensic Sampling Vitiates Prosecution Case: Patna High Court

Gujrat High Court Orders Compensation for Three-Year Delayed Release of Prisoner: ‘Serious Lapse by Jail Authorities

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Gujarat High Court has ordered compensation for a prisoner who remained incarcerated for almost three years due to a shocking oversight by jail authorities. The court criticized the serious lapse on the part of the authorities and directed the state to grant the applicant Rs. 1,00,000 as compensation for his illegal detention.

The case involved Chandanji @ Gato Chhanaji Thakor, who had filed an application seeking regular bail through jail. However, it was revealed that the applicant had been granted regular bail by a previous court order but remained in jail due to negligence.

In the judgment, the court stated, “Considering the plight of the applicant, who has remained in jail despite the order of this Court due to the negligence on the part of the jail authorities... we are directing the State to grant him compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lac).”

The court also emphasized the need for timely release of prisoners granted bail, referencing directions from the Supreme Court, which stressed the importance of ensuring that undertrial prisoners and convicts are released promptly.

Furthermore, the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) came under scrutiny for its failure to identify cases where prisoners granted bail were not released. The court directed all DLSAs to collect data on such cases and the reasons for non-release.

To ensure the implementation of these directions, the matter has been scheduled to be listed on 18.10.2023. This judgment serves as a reminder of the vital importance of upholding the rights of prisoners and the responsibilities of authorities in ensuring timely release.

Date of Decision: 22 September 2023

CHANDANJI @ GATO CHHANAJI THAKOR vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News