Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Gujrat High Court Orders Compensation for Three-Year Delayed Release of Prisoner: ‘Serious Lapse by Jail Authorities

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Gujarat High Court has ordered compensation for a prisoner who remained incarcerated for almost three years due to a shocking oversight by jail authorities. The court criticized the serious lapse on the part of the authorities and directed the state to grant the applicant Rs. 1,00,000 as compensation for his illegal detention.

The case involved Chandanji @ Gato Chhanaji Thakor, who had filed an application seeking regular bail through jail. However, it was revealed that the applicant had been granted regular bail by a previous court order but remained in jail due to negligence.

In the judgment, the court stated, “Considering the plight of the applicant, who has remained in jail despite the order of this Court due to the negligence on the part of the jail authorities... we are directing the State to grant him compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lac).”

The court also emphasized the need for timely release of prisoners granted bail, referencing directions from the Supreme Court, which stressed the importance of ensuring that undertrial prisoners and convicts are released promptly.

Furthermore, the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) came under scrutiny for its failure to identify cases where prisoners granted bail were not released. The court directed all DLSAs to collect data on such cases and the reasons for non-release.

To ensure the implementation of these directions, the matter has been scheduled to be listed on 18.10.2023. This judgment serves as a reminder of the vital importance of upholding the rights of prisoners and the responsibilities of authorities in ensuring timely release.

Date of Decision: 22 September 2023

CHANDANJI @ GATO CHHANAJI THAKOR vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News