Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

FIR Quashing Not Warranted in Partnership Dispute - Prima Facie Case Made Out: Supreme Copurt

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in its judgment delivered on October 19, 2023, has held that the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR) is not warranted in a partnership dispute case. The court observed a “prima facie case” of theft, house trespass, and criminal intimidation, emphasizing that such cognizable offenses deserve proper investigation and legal proceedings.

The case, involving a family dispute over a partnership, arose from a complaint registered under Sections 457, 380, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court had previously quashed the FIR, a decision that was challenged and subsequently overturned by the Supreme Court.

Justice Vikram Nath, who authored the judgment, remarked, “The filing of the Small Causes Suit for eviction by M/s Sushma Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Impleading only respondent No.1 as the defendant speaks volumes about their collusion. What made Ambuj Rastogi believe that it was respondent No.1, who was alone the owner and in possession of the business being run from the shop in question, is nowhere reflected.”

The court further stated, “Theft committed in any building which is used as a human dwelling or for custody of property is punishable under section 380 of the IPC, and the sentence for a term which may extend to seven years and also be liable to fine. In the present case, there was breaking open of the locks of the premises wherein the property was stored for the purposes of theft, the punishment under section 457 of the IPC would extend to 14 years.”

The judgment also emphasized that any observations made in the order are only for deciding the issues raised and should not influence the ongoing investigation or trial, which should proceed independently based on the evidence presented.

This ruling underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring that cases involving alleged criminal activities receive a fair and thorough examination in accordance with the law, even in the context of civil disputes and partnerships.

Date of Decision: October 19, 2023

RUCHIR RASTOGI  vs PANKAJ RASTOGI  AND OTHERS ETC.

Similar News