Law Does Not Countenance Resurrection Of Stale Claims Through Inventive Drafting: Karnataka High Court Rejects 20-Year-Old Partition Dispute CPC Provisions Cannot Be Used to Transfer Consumer Complaints Across States: NCDRC Invokes Section 62 to End Forum-Shifting Ordeal in Nirmal Spinning Mills Case FSSA Provisions Prevail Over PFA Act In Cases Of Overlapping Jurisdiction, Prosecution Under Old Act Impermissible: J&K High Court Motive Pales Into Significance When Direct Ocular Evidence Establishes Crime; Enmity Is A Double-Edged Sword: Allahabad High Court Plaintiff Cannot Succeed Merely On Weakness Of Defence; Initial Burden To Prove Claim Rests On Claimant: Madras High Court Witness Threats Noted By Higher Courts Disentitle Convict To Suspension Of Sentence: Gujarat High Court Family Court Orders Must Be Enforced Immediately, Pendency Of Applications No Excuse For Disobedience: Delhi High Court 'Fraud And Justice Never Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Reverses Order To Grant Land Based On Fabricated Records Development Authority Competent To Sanction Land Use Conversion From Residential To Nursing Home If Permitted Under Master Plan & Zoning Regulations: Allahabad High Court Notification Changing Import Policy From 'Free' To 'Restricted' Operative Only From Exact Time Of Publication In E-Gazette: Delhi High Court On Name Of Protection of the Complainer Excluding Relevant Defence Evidence in Sexual Offences Trials May Breach Fair Trial Rights: UK Supreme Court Boundaries In Sale Deed Prevail Over Discrepancy In Property Description; Adverse Possession Begins From Date Of Hostile Notice: Punjab & Haryana HC Supreme Court of UK Upholds HMRC Decision: Professional Fees Incurred by Investment Holding Company Are Capital Expenditure Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence Citizens Questioning Legality Of Police Action: Madras High Court Quashes Obstruction Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Centre To Treat Ashok Khemka As Empaneled For Future Assignments, Says Denying Relaxation Granted To Peers Is Discriminatory Section 34 Court Cannot Substitute Arbitrator’s Plausible View With Its Own; Not Bound By Technical Rules Of Evidence Act: Madras High Court Article 227 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Reopen Decrees Finalized Four Decades Ago: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Challenge To 1985 Order Daughter Has No Right To Inherit Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 HSA Amendment: Delhi High Court Rejects Plaint Indian Trust Act Inapplicable To Public Religious Endowments; Sale Of Charity Property Without HR&CE Commissioner's Permission Void: Madras High Court Supreme Court Clarifies Status of Collateral Warranties Under Construction Contracts FIR Quashed Against Newsclick: PMLA Proceedings Cannot Stand Alone Without A Predicate Offence, Rules Delhi High Court Assessee Claiming TDS Exemption On "Reimbursement" To Non-Residents Must Obtain Mandatory Tax Determination Under Section 195(2): Madras High Court

Even Relative have No Right To Touch Body of Girl's consent: Mumbai court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


A court in Mulund, Mumbai, recently sentenced a 43-year-old man to one month in jail and a 1,000 fine for holding his minor cousin's hand without her consent and proposing marriage [The State of Maharashtra vs Manikumar Wilson Nadar].

Metropolitan Magistrate RD Dange stated that the accused's relationship to the victim did not give him permission to touch her without her consent.

"In the present case, PW1 testified that the defendant's actions made her feel insulted and ashamed. Even though the accused is PW1's relative, he had no right to touch her without her consent "the Judge ruled.

In February 2009, when she was in ninth grade, the minor filed a complaint at the Bhandup police station under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing harm) and 354 (outraging the modesty of a woman) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). She claimed that while she was walking home from school, her cousin grabbed her hand, proposed marriage, and invited her to his home.

Regarding the violation of Section 354, the court found the prosecution witnesses' testimony credible and convicted the defendant.

However, the defendant was acquitted of the Section 323 offence because the court did not believe the complainant and her sister's testimony that the defendant had struck the victim.

The defendant pleaded for clemency and asked to be released on a bond of good behaviour under the Probation of Offenders Act.

The court determined that the case did not qualify for the benefits of the Probation of Offenders Act due to the nature of the offence, the victim's age, and the ongoing nature of the other complaints.

The State of Maharashtra

versus

Manikumar Wilson Nadar

 

 

 

Latest Legal News