Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Election Petition Must Conform to Rule 6: Maintainability of Election Dispute Petition Clarified: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has settled the debate over the maintainability of election dispute petitions. The judgment, delivered by Justice Bela M. Trivedi on August 16, 2023, emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory procedures when challenging election results.

The case in question, Civil Appeal No. 2517 of 2023, saw the appellant challenging the legality and validity of a judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh. The Division Bench had allowed the writ appeal, overturning the Single Bench’s order and recounting of votes. The central issue revolved around whether an Election Petition solely seeking a recount of votes, without additional reliefs as stipulated by Rule 6 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995, was maintainable.

The Supreme Court’s judgment, echoing precedent, established the principle of strict construction of election laws. The Court upheld the significance of conforming to prescribed procedures. In the words of Justice Trivedi, Where a right or liability is created by a statute, which gives a special remedy for enforcing it, the remedy provided by the statute must be availed of.”

The Court referred to its earlier ruling in the case of Sohan Lal vs. Babu Gandhi and Others, where it clarified the distinction between pre-result and post-result stages in an election dispute. The judgment reinforced the principle that while recounting of votes can be directed, the main reliefs claimed in an Election Petition must align with Rule 6 of the relevant rules.

The Supreme Court concluded that an Election Petition seeking only a recount of votes, without seeking appropriate reliefs as per Rule 6, was not maintainable. As a result, the appeal challenging the impugned judgment was dismissed.

This ruling provides clarity on the procedure for challenging election results and underscores the significance of adhering to statutory provisions. The decision serves as a reminder that election contests are strictly regulated by law and must be approached with precision and compliance.

Date of Decision: 16 August 2023

DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP vs  BABLI SAHU & OTHERS

Similar News