Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Elderly Tenant Granted Time Till 2025 to Vacate, Ensuring Peaceful Resolution Under Rent Control Act: Supreme Court Resolves Landlord-Tenant Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has provided a resolution to a long-standing landlord-tenant dispute under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995. The Court, in its decision dated 23rd February 2024, has granted an elderly tenant, aged 82, time until 28th February 2025 to vacate the premises, ensuring compliance with the Rent Control Act and considering humanitarian grounds.

The case, involving the petitioners (landlords) and the respondent (tenant), pertains to a property dispute over Bungalow No.97, Ground Floor, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi. The tenant, occupying under a lease dated 01.10.1972, was paying a monthly rent of Rs. 2,000, later enhanced to Rs. 3,328. The landlords, a Trust, sought ejectment of the tenant under the Rent Control Act.

Justice Sanjay Karol, in his judgment, noted the amicable resolution reached by both parties. The tenant agreed to the ejectment order, with the Court considering the tenant's age and bereavement due to COVID-19 for granting extended time to vacate. The Court emphasized the tenant's obligations to maintain the property, avoid unauthorized constructions, and clear all statutory dues before vacating. It also highlighted the landlord's responsibility to not hinder the tenant's peaceful occupation.

The Supreme Court disposed of the petition based on the settlement terms agreed upon by the parties. The Court directed the tenant to clear all rent arrears and continue paying the monthly rent until possession is handed over. It also allowed the landlord to initiate legal and contempt proceedings in case of violation of terms by the tenant. All litigation related to the premises was ordered to be closed.

Date of Decision: 23rd February 2024

SWAMI GOVERDHAN RANGACHARIJI & ORS. VERSUS M/S. A.J. PRINTERS

Similar News