UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Elderly Tenant Granted Time Till 2025 to Vacate, Ensuring Peaceful Resolution Under Rent Control Act: Supreme Court Resolves Landlord-Tenant Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has provided a resolution to a long-standing landlord-tenant dispute under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995. The Court, in its decision dated 23rd February 2024, has granted an elderly tenant, aged 82, time until 28th February 2025 to vacate the premises, ensuring compliance with the Rent Control Act and considering humanitarian grounds.

The case, involving the petitioners (landlords) and the respondent (tenant), pertains to a property dispute over Bungalow No.97, Ground Floor, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi. The tenant, occupying under a lease dated 01.10.1972, was paying a monthly rent of Rs. 2,000, later enhanced to Rs. 3,328. The landlords, a Trust, sought ejectment of the tenant under the Rent Control Act.

Justice Sanjay Karol, in his judgment, noted the amicable resolution reached by both parties. The tenant agreed to the ejectment order, with the Court considering the tenant's age and bereavement due to COVID-19 for granting extended time to vacate. The Court emphasized the tenant's obligations to maintain the property, avoid unauthorized constructions, and clear all statutory dues before vacating. It also highlighted the landlord's responsibility to not hinder the tenant's peaceful occupation.

The Supreme Court disposed of the petition based on the settlement terms agreed upon by the parties. The Court directed the tenant to clear all rent arrears and continue paying the monthly rent until possession is handed over. It also allowed the landlord to initiate legal and contempt proceedings in case of violation of terms by the tenant. All litigation related to the premises was ordered to be closed.

Date of Decision: 23rd February 2024

SWAMI GOVERDHAN RANGACHARIJI & ORS. VERSUS M/S. A.J. PRINTERS

Latest Legal News