CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has underscored the crucial role of providing permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The Court made this observation while delivering its judgment in the case of M/s. Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma. In a noteworthy statement, the Court stated, "Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings."

The case pertained to the reinstatement and back wages of Kashiram Verma, who had been directed by the Labour Court to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages. However, despite numerous attempts to serve Verma, including through registered post and courier, he failed to report for duty and did not provide his permanent address. The Court noted that the respondent's conduct indicated a lack of interest in employment, leading to the decision to set aside the award of the Labour Court.

Recognizing the significance of permanent addresses, the Supreme Court highlighted the need for parties in labour law disputes to furnish their permanent addresses for effective relief and the service of notices. It referred to various laws and rules, such as the Payment of Wages Act, Workman Compensation Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, and associated rules, all of which require the mention of permanent addresses.

Moreover, the Court expressed hope that the enforcement of the recently consolidated labour laws into four Codes by Parliament would lead to future rules ensuring the provision of permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The four Codes include the Wage Code, Social Security Code, Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, and The Industrial Relations Code.

The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a crucial reminder for parties involved in labour law disputes to provide their permanent addresses, enabling effective resolution of grievances and ensuring proper service of notices. The decision aligns with the ongoing efforts to streamline and strengthen labour laws in India, with the consolidation of multiple statutes into four comprehensive Codes.

 

Date of Judgment: 16th March 2023

M/s. Creative Garments Ltd.   vs Kashiram Verma 

Latest Legal News