Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |    

Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has underscored the crucial role of providing permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The Court made this observation while delivering its judgment in the case of M/s. Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma. In a noteworthy statement, the Court stated, "Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings."

The case pertained to the reinstatement and back wages of Kashiram Verma, who had been directed by the Labour Court to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages. However, despite numerous attempts to serve Verma, including through registered post and courier, he failed to report for duty and did not provide his permanent address. The Court noted that the respondent's conduct indicated a lack of interest in employment, leading to the decision to set aside the award of the Labour Court.

Recognizing the significance of permanent addresses, the Supreme Court highlighted the need for parties in labour law disputes to furnish their permanent addresses for effective relief and the service of notices. It referred to various laws and rules, such as the Payment of Wages Act, Workman Compensation Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, and associated rules, all of which require the mention of permanent addresses.

Moreover, the Court expressed hope that the enforcement of the recently consolidated labour laws into four Codes by Parliament would lead to future rules ensuring the provision of permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The four Codes include the Wage Code, Social Security Code, Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, and The Industrial Relations Code.

The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a crucial reminder for parties involved in labour law disputes to provide their permanent addresses, enabling effective resolution of grievances and ensuring proper service of notices. The decision aligns with the ongoing efforts to streamline and strengthen labour laws in India, with the consolidation of multiple statutes into four comprehensive Codes.

 

Date of Judgment: 16th March 2023

M/s. Creative Garments Ltd.   vs Kashiram Verma 

Similar News