Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has underscored the crucial role of providing permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The Court made this observation while delivering its judgment in the case of M/s. Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma. In a noteworthy statement, the Court stated, "Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings."

The case pertained to the reinstatement and back wages of Kashiram Verma, who had been directed by the Labour Court to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages. However, despite numerous attempts to serve Verma, including through registered post and courier, he failed to report for duty and did not provide his permanent address. The Court noted that the respondent's conduct indicated a lack of interest in employment, leading to the decision to set aside the award of the Labour Court.

Recognizing the significance of permanent addresses, the Supreme Court highlighted the need for parties in labour law disputes to furnish their permanent addresses for effective relief and the service of notices. It referred to various laws and rules, such as the Payment of Wages Act, Workman Compensation Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, and associated rules, all of which require the mention of permanent addresses.

Moreover, the Court expressed hope that the enforcement of the recently consolidated labour laws into four Codes by Parliament would lead to future rules ensuring the provision of permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The four Codes include the Wage Code, Social Security Code, Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, and The Industrial Relations Code.

The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a crucial reminder for parties involved in labour law disputes to provide their permanent addresses, enabling effective resolution of grievances and ensuring proper service of notices. The decision aligns with the ongoing efforts to streamline and strengthen labour laws in India, with the consolidation of multiple statutes into four comprehensive Codes.

 

Date of Judgment: 16th March 2023

M/s. Creative Garments Ltd.   vs Kashiram Verma 

Latest Legal News