Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has underscored the crucial role of providing permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The Court made this observation while delivering its judgment in the case of M/s. Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma. In a noteworthy statement, the Court stated, "Effective relief can be granted to a worker only if the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings."

The case pertained to the reinstatement and back wages of Kashiram Verma, who had been directed by the Labour Court to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages. However, despite numerous attempts to serve Verma, including through registered post and courier, he failed to report for duty and did not provide his permanent address. The Court noted that the respondent's conduct indicated a lack of interest in employment, leading to the decision to set aside the award of the Labour Court.

Recognizing the significance of permanent addresses, the Supreme Court highlighted the need for parties in labour law disputes to furnish their permanent addresses for effective relief and the service of notices. It referred to various laws and rules, such as the Payment of Wages Act, Workman Compensation Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, and associated rules, all of which require the mention of permanent addresses.

Moreover, the Court expressed hope that the enforcement of the recently consolidated labour laws into four Codes by Parliament would lead to future rules ensuring the provision of permanent addresses in labour law disputes. The four Codes include the Wage Code, Social Security Code, Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, and The Industrial Relations Code.

The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a crucial reminder for parties involved in labour law disputes to provide their permanent addresses, enabling effective resolution of grievances and ensuring proper service of notices. The decision aligns with the ongoing efforts to streamline and strengthen labour laws in India, with the consolidation of multiple statutes into four comprehensive Codes.

 

Date of Judgment: 16th March 2023

M/s. Creative Garments Ltd.   vs Kashiram Verma 

Latest Legal News