Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

DNA Tests on Adopted Children Born to Rape Victims Not a Legal Necessity, Infringe Right to Privacy: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court today ruled that DNA tests on adopted children born to rape victims are not a legal necessity and infringe upon the children’s right to privacy. The judgment emphasized that such tests should not be conducted as part of efforts to establish paternity in rape cases unless absolutely necessary.

This decision came in the wake of multiple lower court orders directing the collection of DNA samples from adopted children to aid in the prosecution of rape cases. The High Court was approached under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the legality of these orders In light of conflicting laws pertaining to the privacy and confidentiality rights of adopted children.

Violation of Privacy: The court held that DNA testing as a means to strengthen prosecution in rape cases infringes on the adopted child’s right to privacy, recognized under various legal provisions including the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and the Adoption Regulations, 2022. The judgment noted, “The JJ Act and the Adoption Regulations both underscore the confidentiality and welfare of the adopted child, which are paramount.”

Legal Necessity and Proportionality: The court pointed out that the proof of paternity is not necessary to establish the crime of rape under relevant laws. Justice K. Babu referenced multiple precedents stressing the necessity and proportionality tests in ordering such invasive tests. He noted, “The use of DNA tests must be carefully considered, keeping in mind the potential psychological impact on the child.”

Guidelines Issued: The court issued guidelines limiting DNA tests on adopted children to exceptional cases where such tests are indispensable. The guidelines further instructed that any necessary DNA samples should be collected before the completion of the adoption process, ensuring the privacy of the child is not compromised post-adoption.

Decision of the Court: The court quashed all orders from various courts within Kerala that had previously directed DNA testing of adopted children in the context of rape investigations, deeming such orders unsustainable given the statutory and constitutional protections in place.

Date of Decision: 19th April 2024

MOTU vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News