Lack Of Title Documents In Lal Dora Land Does Not Relieve Plaintiff From Proving Continuous Possession To Claim Ownership: Delhi High Court Unauthorized Video Recording Of Court Proceedings Without Prior Permission Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Bombay High Court Finality Of Litigation | State Cannot Re-Litigate Settled Decrees By Alleging Collusion After Affirmation Up To Supreme Court: Allahabad High Court SC/ST Act | Court Cannot Determine Conversion Status To Quash FIR Before Completion Of Investigation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Absence Of Manufacturing Activity And Dilapidated Condition Of Premises Constitute Valid Grounds For Closure: Bombay High Court Non-Disclosure Of Existing Insurance Policies In Proposal Form Entitles Insurer To Repudiate Claim: Calcutta High Court Will Interpretation | Bequest Of "Above Said Property" Includes Entire Estate, Not Just Descriptive Portions Mentioned Therein: Delhi High Court Limitation Act | Court Can Balance Equities By Denying Interest For Delay Period In Land Acquisition Appeals: Gujarat High Court Article 21 Constitution Of India | Personal Liberty Of Detenue Cannot Be Curtailed Without Authority Of Law Post-Acquittal: Jharkhand High Court Order 8 Rule 1A CPC | Trial Court Should Not Reject Documents Merely For Delay If Foundation Is Laid In Pleadings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order XXII CPC Applies To SCC Suits; Rule 25 Of U.P. Urban Buildings Rules Does Not Govern Substitution Where Act Is Inapplicable: Allahabad High Court Recruitment Authorities Cannot Insist On Impossible Experience Criteria: Karnataka High Court Rules Against Rejection Of Motor Vehicle Inspector Candidates Order 38 Rule 8 CPC | Claim Petition Cannot Be Allowed Ex-Parte Without Adjudication On Merits: Kerala High Court Succession Certificate Under Section 372 Indian Succession Act Cannot Be Granted When Title Is Subject To Intricate Questions Of Fact And Law: Madras High Court SARFAESI Act | District Magistrate Cannot Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower And Secured Creditor While Assisting Possession: Madhya Pradesh High Court Termination Based On Caste Status Without Cancellation Of Original Certificate Is Legally Unsustainable: Orissa High Court Section 13 Punjab Village Common Lands Act | Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted In Private Injunction Suits Where Title Against Panchayat Is Not Sought: High Court Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act  | Equal Opportunity Policy Of Employer Is Mandatory; Routine Transfer Policy Must Yield To Special Provisions For Caregivers: Rajasthan High Court Compensation Must Be Just, Not A Pittance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Award In Motor Accident Claim Registration Act | Sub-Registrar Has No Power To Adjudicate Title Or Refuse Registration Based On Unauthorized Layouts: Telangana High Court Section 50 NDPS Act | Failure To Individually Communicate Right To Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Or Magistrate Vitiates Conviction: Telangana High Court Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC | Civil Suit For Specific Performance Cannot Bypass Execution Proceedings When Breach Of Lok Adalat Compromise Is Alleged: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 269 BNS | Court Can Order Registration Of Fresh FIR Against Accused Who Absconds After Grant Of Bail: Madras High Court Eviction Order Not Vitiated If Based On Sufficient Independent Ground Of Unauthorized Subletting Under Section 4 Of Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act: Bombay High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Cannot Be Rejected On Ground Of Being 'Premature' If It Discloses A Cause Of Action: Allahabad High Court

DNA Tests on Adopted Children Born to Rape Victims Not a Legal Necessity, Infringe Right to Privacy: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court today ruled that DNA tests on adopted children born to rape victims are not a legal necessity and infringe upon the children’s right to privacy. The judgment emphasized that such tests should not be conducted as part of efforts to establish paternity in rape cases unless absolutely necessary.

This decision came in the wake of multiple lower court orders directing the collection of DNA samples from adopted children to aid in the prosecution of rape cases. The High Court was approached under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the legality of these orders In light of conflicting laws pertaining to the privacy and confidentiality rights of adopted children.

Violation of Privacy: The court held that DNA testing as a means to strengthen prosecution in rape cases infringes on the adopted child’s right to privacy, recognized under various legal provisions including the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and the Adoption Regulations, 2022. The judgment noted, “The JJ Act and the Adoption Regulations both underscore the confidentiality and welfare of the adopted child, which are paramount.”

Legal Necessity and Proportionality: The court pointed out that the proof of paternity is not necessary to establish the crime of rape under relevant laws. Justice K. Babu referenced multiple precedents stressing the necessity and proportionality tests in ordering such invasive tests. He noted, “The use of DNA tests must be carefully considered, keeping in mind the potential psychological impact on the child.”

Guidelines Issued: The court issued guidelines limiting DNA tests on adopted children to exceptional cases where such tests are indispensable. The guidelines further instructed that any necessary DNA samples should be collected before the completion of the adoption process, ensuring the privacy of the child is not compromised post-adoption.

Decision of the Court: The court quashed all orders from various courts within Kerala that had previously directed DNA testing of adopted children in the context of rape investigations, deeming such orders unsustainable given the statutory and constitutional protections in place.

Date of Decision: 19th April 2024

MOTU vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News