MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

DNA Tests on Adopted Children Born to Rape Victims Not a Legal Necessity, Infringe Right to Privacy: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court today ruled that DNA tests on adopted children born to rape victims are not a legal necessity and infringe upon the children’s right to privacy. The judgment emphasized that such tests should not be conducted as part of efforts to establish paternity in rape cases unless absolutely necessary.

This decision came in the wake of multiple lower court orders directing the collection of DNA samples from adopted children to aid in the prosecution of rape cases. The High Court was approached under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the legality of these orders In light of conflicting laws pertaining to the privacy and confidentiality rights of adopted children.

Violation of Privacy: The court held that DNA testing as a means to strengthen prosecution in rape cases infringes on the adopted child’s right to privacy, recognized under various legal provisions including the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and the Adoption Regulations, 2022. The judgment noted, “The JJ Act and the Adoption Regulations both underscore the confidentiality and welfare of the adopted child, which are paramount.”

Legal Necessity and Proportionality: The court pointed out that the proof of paternity is not necessary to establish the crime of rape under relevant laws. Justice K. Babu referenced multiple precedents stressing the necessity and proportionality tests in ordering such invasive tests. He noted, “The use of DNA tests must be carefully considered, keeping in mind the potential psychological impact on the child.”

Guidelines Issued: The court issued guidelines limiting DNA tests on adopted children to exceptional cases where such tests are indispensable. The guidelines further instructed that any necessary DNA samples should be collected before the completion of the adoption process, ensuring the privacy of the child is not compromised post-adoption.

Decision of the Court: The court quashed all orders from various courts within Kerala that had previously directed DNA testing of adopted children in the context of rape investigations, deeming such orders unsustainable given the statutory and constitutional protections in place.

Date of Decision: 19th April 2024

MOTU vs. THE STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News