Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Disdainful Attitude of District Collectors May Land Them into a Difficult Situation: Supreme Court on Non-Compliance with ED Summons

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has expressed its displeasure over the non-compliance of its earlier order by several District Collectors of Tamil Nadu in the matter concerning the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) summons under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The Court observed, “Such cavalier approach and disdainful attitude of the District Collectors may land them into a difficult situation.”

The primary legal point in this judgment revolves around the compliance of the judiciary’s orders and the respect for the legal system. The case centers on the refusal of the District Collectors to adhere to the Supreme Court’s direction to appear in response to the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) filed Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) against the judgment of the High Court of Madras. The High Court judgment had omitted the names of certain District Collectors, who were summoned by the ED. The Supreme Court, in a previous order dated 27.02.2024, stayed the operation of this judgment and directed the Collectors to respond to the ED summons. However, the District Collectors filed replies excusing their non-compliance, citing engagement in the upcoming General Elections and the need to collect data from various departments.

Compliance with Court Orders: The Supreme Court criticized the non-appearance of the District Collectors before the ED, stating, “By not following the order, they have created an impression that they do not have respect either for the Court, or for the law, much less for the Constitution of India.”

Review of Collectors’ Conduct: The Court described their conduct as a ‘cavalier approach and disdainful attitude,’ which is strongly deprecated.

Consideration of Election Duties: Acknowledging the upcoming General Elections in Tamil Nadu, the Court nonetheless emphasized the importance of complying with its orders.

Granting of Another Opportunity: In view of the pending General Elections, the Court decided to give the District Collectors one more chance to comply with the summons.

The Supreme Court directed the District Collectors to personally appear before the ED on 25.04.2024 and respond to the summons under Section 50 of the PMLA, regarding the information/data sought. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in a strict view being taken against them. The matter is listed for reporting compliance on 06.05.2024.

Date of Decision: 02-04-2024

Directorate of Enforcement v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

Similar News