Supreme Court Strikes Down Expulsion of Bihar MLC as Disproportionate, Orders Immediate Reinstatement Private Banks Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Allegation of Forgery is Not Enough: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute When a Case is Made Out for Bail, Courts Should Not Hesitate: Kerala High Court Allows Bail Despite Commercial Quantity of Drugs Seized Retailers Cannot Be Prosecuted for Manufacturer’s Fault" – Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Pesticide Dealers Mere Issuance of a Cheque Does Not Prove Legally Enforceable Debt": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonor Case Courts Cannot Ignore Urgent Repairs When Public Safety is at Stake: Calcutta High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Bombay High Court Rejects Premature Dismissal of Partition Suit No Substantial Question of Law – High Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Injunction Cannot Be Granted Without Proof of Possession: Allahabad High Court Quashes Relief in Land Dispute Section 197 CrPC | Sanction for Prosecution is a Shield, Not a Sword: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against BIS Officer Landlord is the Best Judge of His Needs: Supreme Court Orders Eviction in Favor of Landowner Vijaya Bank TT Scam | Supreme Court Acquits Jeweller in ₹6.7 Crore Vijaya Bank Fraud Case, Orders Return of 205 Gold Bars Procurement Preference for Small Enterprises is a Legal Mandate, Not a Mere Policy: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of MSMEs Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Against Interlocutory Orders of Commercial Courts: Orissa High Court Declares Section 8 Bar Absolute Victim’s Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality to Be Sole Basis of Conviction: Kerala High Court Reduces Sentence of Pastor Convicted for Repeated Rape of Minor Providing Set-Top Boxes to Subscribers Constitutes Sale”: Karnataka High Court Upholds VAT on Tata Play Limited Mere Registration of FIR Cannot Justify Denial of Passport Renewal: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Digitization of records in all criminal trials and civil suits now mandatory, directs Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 24 April 2023, Supreme Court in a Judgement, JITENDRA KUMAR RODE Vs UNION OF INDIA , directed the Registrar General of all High Courts to ensure that the digitization of records is duly undertaken in all criminal trial cases and civil suits, with promptitude at all District Courts, preferably within the time prescribed for filing an appeal within the laws of procedure. The Court also directed the concerned District Judges to ensure that the digitized records are verified as expeditiously as possible and a continually updated record of the Register of Records digitized is maintained with periodic reports being sent to the concerned High Courts for suitable directions.

The Court observed that the language of Section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates the Court sitting in appeal to call for the records of the case from the concerned Court below, peruse them, and then decide the appeal. The Court held that failure to comply with this mandate would result in a violation of Article 21.

In the present case, the Appellate Court had upheld the conviction of the accused even though the relevant Trial Court record could not be reconstructed and the essential documents necessary to appreciate the appeal on its merits were not available. The Appellate Court had held that the counsel for the accused, who filed the appeal, must have perused the record at the time of filing the appeal. However, the Supreme Court held that the job of the Court of Appeal is not to depend on the lower Court's judgment to uphold the conviction but to come to a conclusion based on the record available before it.

The Court further held that, in certain cases contingent upon specific facts and circumstances of the case, non-compliance with the mandate of Section 385 would result in a violation of Article 21. However, the Court also observed that ordering a retrial in cases where the time elapsed since the commission of the offence is significant and the essential documents such as the FIR or witness statements are not available, would not be in the interest of justice and would not serve any fruitful purpose

The Court also directed the Registrar General of all High Courts to ensure that the digitization of records is duly undertaken in all criminal trial cases and civil suits, with promptitude at all District Courts, preferably within the time prescribed for filing an appeal within the laws of procedure. The Court also directed the concerned District Judges to ensure that the digitized records are verified as expeditiously as possible and a continually updated record of the Register of Records digitized is maintained with periodic reports being sent to the concerned High Courts for suitable directions.

JITENDRA KUMAR RODE Vs UNION OF INDIA

Similar News