Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court

Digitization of records in all criminal trials and civil suits now mandatory, directs Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 24 April 2023, Supreme Court in a Judgement, JITENDRA KUMAR RODE Vs UNION OF INDIA , directed the Registrar General of all High Courts to ensure that the digitization of records is duly undertaken in all criminal trial cases and civil suits, with promptitude at all District Courts, preferably within the time prescribed for filing an appeal within the laws of procedure. The Court also directed the concerned District Judges to ensure that the digitized records are verified as expeditiously as possible and a continually updated record of the Register of Records digitized is maintained with periodic reports being sent to the concerned High Courts for suitable directions.

The Court observed that the language of Section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates the Court sitting in appeal to call for the records of the case from the concerned Court below, peruse them, and then decide the appeal. The Court held that failure to comply with this mandate would result in a violation of Article 21.

In the present case, the Appellate Court had upheld the conviction of the accused even though the relevant Trial Court record could not be reconstructed and the essential documents necessary to appreciate the appeal on its merits were not available. The Appellate Court had held that the counsel for the accused, who filed the appeal, must have perused the record at the time of filing the appeal. However, the Supreme Court held that the job of the Court of Appeal is not to depend on the lower Court's judgment to uphold the conviction but to come to a conclusion based on the record available before it.

The Court further held that, in certain cases contingent upon specific facts and circumstances of the case, non-compliance with the mandate of Section 385 would result in a violation of Article 21. However, the Court also observed that ordering a retrial in cases where the time elapsed since the commission of the offence is significant and the essential documents such as the FIR or witness statements are not available, would not be in the interest of justice and would not serve any fruitful purpose

The Court also directed the Registrar General of all High Courts to ensure that the digitization of records is duly undertaken in all criminal trial cases and civil suits, with promptitude at all District Courts, preferably within the time prescribed for filing an appeal within the laws of procedure. The Court also directed the concerned District Judges to ensure that the digitized records are verified as expeditiously as possible and a continually updated record of the Register of Records digitized is maintained with periodic reports being sent to the concerned High Courts for suitable directions.

JITENDRA KUMAR RODE Vs UNION OF INDIA

Latest Legal News