MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Deprivation of Personal Liberty Without Ensuring Speedy Trial is Not Consistent with Article 21:  High Court

04 December 2024 2:04 PM

By: sayum


Justice Kirti Singh grants bail to Harwinder Singh @ Mintu, emphasizing the constitutional right to a timely trial. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to Harwinder Singh @ Mintu in a case involving the alleged recovery of 150 kg of poppy husk. The court underscored the constitutional right to a speedy trial, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The decision, delivered by Justice Kirti Singh, balances the seriousness of the allegations with the necessity of upholding the accused's rights.

Harwinder Singh @ Mintu was arrested on January 5, 2023, following the recovery of 150 kg of poppy husk from a Jeep he was allegedly driving. The case was registered under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, 1985, with additional charges under Sections 186, 353, 332, and 333 of the IPC added later. The petitioner has been in custody since his arrest, and the trial has seen no significant progress, with none of the 26 prosecution witnesses examined to date.

The court emphasized the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial under Article 21. Justice Kirti Singh referenced the landmark case of Hussainara Khatoon vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, highlighting that prolonged pre-trial detention contradicts the principles of fairness and justice. "Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21," the judgment noted​​.

The defense counsel cited several Supreme Court judgments, including Mithun SK vs. State of West Bengal, which reiterated the importance of procedural compliance in cases involving secret information and the NDPS Act. The court acknowledged these precedents, noting that the right to a fair trial includes timely proceedings.

Justice Singh stated, "The period of remand and pre-conviction detention should be as short as possible. The accused should not be subjected to unnecessary or unduly long incarceration prior to his conviction"​​.

Justice Kirti Singh remarked, "The right to speedy trial flowing from Article 21 encompasses all stages of judicial proceedings. It is the responsibility of the judiciary to ensure that trials are conducted without undue delay, safeguarding the personal liberty of the accused"​​.

The High Court's decision to grant bail to Harwinder Singh @ Mintu reinforces the judiciary's commitment to upholding constitutional rights while balancing the needs of justice. This ruling underscores the critical importance of speedy trials and may influence future judicial practices in handling similar cases, ensuring that the accused are not subjected to prolonged detention without trial.

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

 

Latest Legal News