MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Upholds the Sanctity of Testator’s Intent in Granting Probate – ‘A Testamentary Court is Not a Court of Suspicion, But That of Conscience’ Rules Justice Rekha Palli”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment passed on November 17, 2023, the Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a contested Will, emphasizing the importance of the testator’s intent and mental state in testamentary disputes. Justice Rekha Palli, in her profound observation, stated, “A testamentary court is not a court of suspicion, but that of conscience.”

The case revolved around the Will dated September 27, 2012, of the late Ms. Kanval Dhillon, with her sisters challenging its authenticity. They contested the probate citing concerns over overwriting and cuttings in the Will. The petitioners, close friends of the deceased, sought to validate the Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The crux of the dispute lay in the interpretation of the Indian Succession Act’s provisions regarding the execution of Wills, specifically Section 63, and the impact of alleged alterations on the Will’s validity. Justice Palli, in her judgment, delved deep into these aspects, underscoring the necessity to consider the testamentary intent and the mental state of the testator.

The court meticulously analyzed the testimonies of witnesses from both sides, including that of Ms. Seema Bansal (PW4), an attesting witness. The evidence reinforced the notion that the testatrix was of sound disposing mind when drafting the Will, despite the familial disputes and subsequent litigations.

Justice Palli’s decision not only elucidates the legal principles governing the execution of Wills but also sheds light on the complex interplay between familial relations and legal rights. The judgment is a testament to the court’s commitment to uphold the true wishes of the testator, ensuring that justice prevails in the realm of testamentary law.

Justice Palli reinforced the notion that minor alterations in a Will do not necessarily mar its validity, especially when the overarching intent remains clear and unambiguous. This judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving contested Wills, emphasizing the need for a balanced and conscientious approach in such sensitive legal matters.

Date of Decision: 17 November 2023

BHUPINDER SINGH & ORS VS  STATE & OTHERS      

Latest Legal News