NDPS | Mentioning FIR Number On Memos Before Registration Makes the Entire Recovery Suspect: Himachal Pradesh High Court MACT | Once Deceased Is Proven To Be Skilled Worker, Deputy Commissioner's Wage Notification Is Applicable: P&H HC Bank’s Technical Excuses Can’t Override Employee’s Right to Ex Gratia Under Old Circulars: Bombay High Court Slams Canara Bank’s Rejection of Claim Once Worker Files Affidavit of Unemployment, Burden Shifts to Employer to Prove Gainful Employment: Delhi High Court Grants 17B Relief Despite 12-Year Delay Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Limitation Act | Quasi-Judicial Bodies Cannot Invoke Section 5 Principles Without Express Statutory Grant: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Commencement of Proceedings Triggered by Notice Receipt, Not Section 11 Filing: Supreme Court Strong and Cogent Evidence Must Exist at the Threshold to Deny Bail Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court Appellate Court Under Section 37 Cannot Sit in Appeal Over Arbitral Award on Merits: Supreme Court Affidavit Ratifying Power of Attorney Cannot Be Disowned Later: Supreme Court Orders Specific Performance Despite Earlier Revocation Claims No Law Empowers a Corporation to Haunt a Retiree: Supreme Court Quashes Post-Retirement Disciplinary Action for Want of Jurisdiction Mere Expectation of Higher Bids Can't Justify Cancelling a Valid Auction: Supreme Court Quashes GDA’s Arbitrary Rejection of Highest Bidder Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21, Even in Grave Economic Offences: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Arvind Dham in ₹673 Crore PMLA Case Article 14 | ‘Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midstream’: Supreme Court Quashes Punjab’s Modified Sports Quota Policy for MBBS Admissions Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midway: Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Retrospective Recruitment Amendment "Imaginary Ghost" - Court Permits Karthigai Deepam at Thiruparankundram ‘Deepathoon’: Madras High Court 353 IPC | Continuing Prosecution Against Citizens Despite Statutory Findings of Police Atrocities Is Abuse of Process: Kerala High Court Court Cannot Compel Plaintiff to Continue Suit Where No Liberty to File Fresh Suit is Sought: Bombay High Court Claim for Demurrage is Not a Crystallized Debt—Only an Unadjudicated Right to Sue: Andhra Pradesh High Court Declared Foreign Nationals Have No Right to Reside in India: Gauhati High Court Upholds Expulsion of Bangladeshi Woman Without Requiring Deportation Protocols

Delhi High Court Upholds the Role of Sole Guardian in Estate Administration, Dismisses Application for Independent Administrator

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, presided over by Justice Yashwant Varma, has reaffirmed the existing arrangement of a Sole Guardian overseeing the estate of a deceased individual, identified as DMP. The court dismissed an application seeking the appointment of an independent Administrator pendente lite under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, emphasizing the sufficiency and effectiveness of the Sole Guardian's role.

Justice Varma, in his detailed judgment, noted, "The power conferred upon a court by virtue of Section 247 is not intended to be invoked for the purposes of a mere reiteration of an appointment already made." This observation highlighted the court's view on the redundancy of appointing an independent administrator given the competent management by the Sole Guardian.

The case centered around the estate of DMP, a deceased individual with significant assets. The court had previously appointed a Sole Guardian to oversee DMP's estate, following disputes among heirs and allegations of mismanagement. The recent application contested this arrangement, proposing the need for an independent Administrator pendente lite.

Justice Varma's ruling was grounded in the evaluation of the Sole Guardian's performance and the lack of justification for altering the current management structure. The court found no evidence suggesting the ineffectiveness or inadequacy of the Sole Guardian. "The appointment of an Administrator independently by the Court in these proceedings would have been warranted provided a perceivable breach or lacuna had existed."

This decision sets a precedent in how courts may approach estate administration disputes, particularly when a Sole Guardian is already in place. It underscores the judiciary's inclination to avoid disrupting existing, effective administrative arrangements unless compelling evidence indicates the necessity for change.

Date of Decision: November 20, 2023                             

KANCHANA RAI VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Latest Legal News