Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Delhi High Court Upholds Summary Procedure in Loan Recovery Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court upheld the summary procedure for the expeditious disposal of suits in a case related to the recovery of a loan amount. The appellant's appeal, filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), was dismissed by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN on September 27, 2023.

The case involved a suit filed by the respondent for the recovery of a loan of Rs. 6,00,000/-. The appellant had initially sought leave to defend, which was granted conditionally. However, the appellant failed to comply with the conditions set by the Trial Court, leading to the passing of the impugned judgment.

The court emphasized the importance of adhering to timelines under Order XXXVII of the CPC, which provides for a summary procedure to avoid protracted procedural delays in defenseless suits. The Trial Court had granted sufficient opportunities to the appellant, including conditional leave to defend, in line with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.

The appellant's contentions that they were not aware of the conditions imposed were rejected by the Trial Court, which deemed the subsequent application and appeal as attempts to evade liability. Consequently, the procedure under Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(b) of the CPC was followed, allowing judgment in favor of the respondent.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN stated, "The summary procedure has been provided to obviate protracted procedural delays in defenseless suits, and it must be strictly followed." The court found no merit in the appellant's arguments and dismissed the appeal with costs awarded to the respondent.

This judgment reaffirms the significance of procedural compliance and adherence to the timelines set by the law in cases governed by summary procedures.

Date of Decision: September 27, 2023

NAVJOT SINGH VS ALEXANDER DAS

Similar News