Confiscation Of Vehicle Under Section 49 Assam Forest Regulation Is Only Temporary; Final Confiscation Requires Conviction Under Section 51: Gauhati High Court Amendment Of Written Statement Cannot Be Allowed After Trial Commences If Facts Were Within Party's Knowledge: Delhi High Court Section 149 IPC Cannot Be Invoked If Number Of Convicted Persons Falls Below Five After Acquittal Of Co-Accused: Allahabad High Court Requirement Of 'Clear Seven Days' Notice For No-Confidence Motion Under West Bengal Panchayat Act Is Procedural, Not Mandatory: Calcutta High Court Cooperative Society’s General Body Cannot Ratify Appointment Made In Violation Of Statutory Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registered Will Executed In Hospital Carries Presumption Of Genuineness; Illness Doesn't Equal Unsound Mind: Delhi High Court Exacting Work From Teachers Without Paying Salary Amounts To 'Begar', Violates Article 23: Bombay High Court General & Omnibus Charge Sheet Lacking Individual Roles Of Accused In Matrimonial Case Is Abuse Of Process: Calcutta High Court Admission Of Claim By IRP Not An 'Acknowledgment Of Liability' Under Section 18 Limitation Act To Extend Limitation: Supreme Court Special Appeal Against Order Refusing To Initiate Contempt Proceedings Not Maintainable If Merits Of Original Case Not Decided: Allahabad High Court Prior Sanction Not Required For Magistrate To Direct FIR Registration Under Section 156(3) CrPC; It Is A Pre-Cognizance Stage: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Create Or Expand Criminal Offences In Absence Of Legislative Action: Supreme Court Rejects Plea For Specific Hate Speech Law State Cannot Reopen Regularisation Issues That Attained Finality; ISRO Must Grant Permanent Status To Daily-Wagers: Supreme Court Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration Of Title Must Succeed On Strength Of Own Title, Not Weakness Of Defendant’s Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court Interest Of Justice Demands Child Of Tender Age Remains In Mother's Custody: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment Debtors Cannot Approbate And Reprobate; Must Adhere To Agreed Valuation In Compromise Decree: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Act As Appellate Court Under Article 227 Supervisory Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores NICE Project Land Valuation Material Omissions In Section 161 Statements Cannot Be Cured By Improvements During Trial: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Courts Must Guard Against Roping In All Family Members Without Specific Evidence Of Individual Roles: Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Pawan Khera In Forgery Case, Says Allegations Prima Facie Appear Politically Motivated

Declined to transfer investigation to CBI Against Ex Minister of Maharashtra – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court recently observed (Anant Thanur Karmuse Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. 24 Feb 2023) that investigation may only be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in "rare and exceptional cases." The observation was made while hearing an appeal filed by a civil engineer who was allegedly beaten up by police personnel at the behest of a Maharashtra Cabinet Minister. The engineer had sought transfer of the investigation into the matter to the CBI.

Supreme Court recently held that fundamental right of fair investigation and trial: The victim has a fundamental right to fair investigation and trial, and therefore, the mere filing of chargesheets and framing of charges cannot be an impediment in ordering further investigation, re-investigation, or de novo investigation, if the facts warrant it. The Court's focus should be on fair investigation and trial only.

According to the Appellant, he had shared a viral picture of the Minister ridiculing the Prime Minister of India on his Facebook account in April 2020. After this, the police came to his residence and took him to the Minister's bungalow, where he was allegedly beaten up and asked to delete the post. The engineer subsequently filed a complaint with the police against the Minister and his men.

The police initially filed a chargesheet without naming the Minister as an accused, but he was added as an accused two years later after the High Court intervened. The engineer had approached the High Court seeking transfer of the investigation to the CBI or some other agency, but the court had dismissed his plea.

Supreme Court held that fundamental right of fair investigation and trial: The victim has a fundamental right to fair investigation and trial, and therefore, the mere filing of chargesheets and framing of charges cannot be an impediment in ordering further investigation, re-investigation, or de novo investigation, if the facts warrant it. The Court's focus should be on fair investigation and trial only.

Court also held that in the present case, a case is made out for further investigation as the State agency may be permitted to conduct a further investigation to bring on record further material in the interest of fair investigation and trial. The High Court's failure to order or permit the State to conduct further investigation is a serious error. However , prayer to transfer investigation to CBI has been declined.

Anant Thanur Karmuse Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors

Latest Legal News