Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Declined to transfer investigation to CBI Against Ex Minister of Maharashtra – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court recently observed (Anant Thanur Karmuse Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. 24 Feb 2023) that investigation may only be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in "rare and exceptional cases." The observation was made while hearing an appeal filed by a civil engineer who was allegedly beaten up by police personnel at the behest of a Maharashtra Cabinet Minister. The engineer had sought transfer of the investigation into the matter to the CBI.

Supreme Court recently held that fundamental right of fair investigation and trial: The victim has a fundamental right to fair investigation and trial, and therefore, the mere filing of chargesheets and framing of charges cannot be an impediment in ordering further investigation, re-investigation, or de novo investigation, if the facts warrant it. The Court's focus should be on fair investigation and trial only.

According to the Appellant, he had shared a viral picture of the Minister ridiculing the Prime Minister of India on his Facebook account in April 2020. After this, the police came to his residence and took him to the Minister's bungalow, where he was allegedly beaten up and asked to delete the post. The engineer subsequently filed a complaint with the police against the Minister and his men.

The police initially filed a chargesheet without naming the Minister as an accused, but he was added as an accused two years later after the High Court intervened. The engineer had approached the High Court seeking transfer of the investigation to the CBI or some other agency, but the court had dismissed his plea.

Supreme Court held that fundamental right of fair investigation and trial: The victim has a fundamental right to fair investigation and trial, and therefore, the mere filing of chargesheets and framing of charges cannot be an impediment in ordering further investigation, re-investigation, or de novo investigation, if the facts warrant it. The Court's focus should be on fair investigation and trial only.

Court also held that in the present case, a case is made out for further investigation as the State agency may be permitted to conduct a further investigation to bring on record further material in the interest of fair investigation and trial. The High Court's failure to order or permit the State to conduct further investigation is a serious error. However , prayer to transfer investigation to CBI has been declined.

Anant Thanur Karmuse Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors

Latest Legal News