Electricity Act 2003 | Section 56(2) Does Not Preclude Licensee From Raising Supplementary Demand After Two Years; Only Restricts Right To Disconnect: Supreme Court Dissolution Of Partnership At Will | Outgoing Partner Entitled To Market Value Of Assets As On Date Of Distribution, Not Date Of Dissolution: Supreme Court SEBI | Release Of Escrow Under Buyback Regulations Does Not Preclude Independent Inquiry Into Fraud Under PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Promotion Based On Merit Does Not Wipe Out Past Adverse Records But Must Be Balanced In FR 56(j) Compulsory Retirement: Supreme Court Appellate Court Can Convict For Offence Even If Charge Not Framed By Trial Court Under Section 464 CrPC: Supreme Court Extradition | Sovereign Assurance Does Not Override Judicial Sentencing; Cannot Be Used To Artificially Accelerate Sentence Completion: Supreme Court Article 21 | State Has A Positive Duty To Protect Public Health By Implementing Front-Of-Package Labelling Regulations: Supreme Court Revenue Entries Are Not Documents Of Title, Cannot Replace Substantive Evidence In Property Disputes: Supreme Court Long Possession Without Hostile Animus Does Not Amount To Adverse Possession: Supreme Court Administrative Discretion Must Comply With Article 14; Subsequent Executive Decisions Cannot Retroactively Cure Failure Of Timely Performance: Supreme Court Municipal Corporation Cannot Unilaterally Downgrade Market Value Of Land Acquired For Road Widening To Deny TDR Certificates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Execution Of Agreement To Sell Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Tenancy: Allahabad High Court Writ Jurisdiction Not Maintainable When Title To Property Is Under A Cloud And Subject Matter Of Disputed Facts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Amendment Of Plaint Seeking Impleadment Of Third Parties And Addition Of Time-Barred Claims In A Partition Suit Cannot Be Permitted: Bombay High Court Reassessment Order Does Not Result In Merger Of Original Assessment Order If Issues Are Distinct: Andhra Pradesh High Court GST Assessment Order Uploaded Only Under 'Additional Notices' Tab Without Separate Intimation Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Calcutta High Court 'Prolonged Inaction' Cannot Be Rewarded: Delhi High Court Upholds CESTAT Refusal To Condone 968-Day Delay In Filing Customs Appeal Probate No Longer Mandatory To Establish Rights Under A Will Following 2025 Amendment To Indian Succession Act: J&K High Court Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used To Introduce New Factual Foundations Or Reopen Concluded Arbitral Awards: Karnataka High Court High Court Cannot Invoke Article 227 To Strike Off Plaint When Statutory Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Is Available: Madras High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Arrest And Subsequent Remand: Orissa High Court Arbitrator Is The Sole Judge Of Quality And Quantity Of Evidence, Court Cannot Act As Court Of Appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 5 Limitation Act | Court Cannot Condone Delay In A Mechanical Manner Without Ascertaining Bona Fides Of The Applicant: Calcutta High Court High Court Cannot Quash FIR Under Section 482 CrPC By Conducting Mini-Trial On Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court Taxation Law | Mere Assertion Of Natural Justice Violation On Disputed Facts Won't Bypass Statutory Appeal: Delhi High Court

Criminal Justice System works like Punishment in Itself - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In its ruling on a criminal appeal that was filed 13 years ago, the Supreme Court observed that our country's criminal justice system "may itself be a punishment."

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S. Oka's bench made this observation after noting that a case involving the framing of charges had been on appeal in the Supreme Court for 13 years.

The issue before the court included a student who took his own life after being subjected to disciplinary action by the school administration. According to the accusation made by the student's father claiming they were responsible for the suicide, a charge sheet was filed against the teacher, the department head, and the principal. In 2009, the Trial Court formally filed charges against the defendant.

The High Court dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition, noting that the procedures were in their early stages and did not require interference. Thus, the accused went to the Supreme Court, which in 2009 granted a temporary stay.

"The current appeals were prioritized as a response to that order, and a preliminary stay was granted. In light of this Court's stay, the trial did not, of course, continue. For the past thirteen years, that has been the state of the situation "In the ruling dismissing the appeal after 13 years, the bench made this observation.

The bench introduced the order by saying the following: "Our country's judicial system can be used as punishment in and of itself! In this instance, it has exactly taken place. 14 years on the matter of aiding suicide in an incident where a student was disciplined for misconduct in the College and on trying to take disciplinary action and summon the father, albeit the parent did not show up and the child subsequently committed himself. regrettable circumstance"

The bench thought about the appeal and stated that, even after reading the charge sheet, there is still no proof of aiding suicide based on the current complaint. Finally, the accused was released after the appeal was accepted. This report deals with this aspect of the order.

V.P. Singh vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News