Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Criminal Justice System works like Punishment in Itself - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In its ruling on a criminal appeal that was filed 13 years ago, the Supreme Court observed that our country's criminal justice system "may itself be a punishment."

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S. Oka's bench made this observation after noting that a case involving the framing of charges had been on appeal in the Supreme Court for 13 years.

The issue before the court included a student who took his own life after being subjected to disciplinary action by the school administration. According to the accusation made by the student's father claiming they were responsible for the suicide, a charge sheet was filed against the teacher, the department head, and the principal. In 2009, the Trial Court formally filed charges against the defendant.

The High Court dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition, noting that the procedures were in their early stages and did not require interference. Thus, the accused went to the Supreme Court, which in 2009 granted a temporary stay.

"The current appeals were prioritized as a response to that order, and a preliminary stay was granted. In light of this Court's stay, the trial did not, of course, continue. For the past thirteen years, that has been the state of the situation "In the ruling dismissing the appeal after 13 years, the bench made this observation.

The bench introduced the order by saying the following: "Our country's judicial system can be used as punishment in and of itself! In this instance, it has exactly taken place. 14 years on the matter of aiding suicide in an incident where a student was disciplined for misconduct in the College and on trying to take disciplinary action and summon the father, albeit the parent did not show up and the child subsequently committed himself. regrettable circumstance"

The bench thought about the appeal and stated that, even after reading the charge sheet, there is still no proof of aiding suicide based on the current complaint. Finally, the accused was released after the appeal was accepted. This report deals with this aspect of the order.

V.P. Singh vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News