UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Criminal Justice System works like Punishment in Itself - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In its ruling on a criminal appeal that was filed 13 years ago, the Supreme Court observed that our country's criminal justice system "may itself be a punishment."

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S. Oka's bench made this observation after noting that a case involving the framing of charges had been on appeal in the Supreme Court for 13 years.

The issue before the court included a student who took his own life after being subjected to disciplinary action by the school administration. According to the accusation made by the student's father claiming they were responsible for the suicide, a charge sheet was filed against the teacher, the department head, and the principal. In 2009, the Trial Court formally filed charges against the defendant.

The High Court dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition, noting that the procedures were in their early stages and did not require interference. Thus, the accused went to the Supreme Court, which in 2009 granted a temporary stay.

"The current appeals were prioritized as a response to that order, and a preliminary stay was granted. In light of this Court's stay, the trial did not, of course, continue. For the past thirteen years, that has been the state of the situation "In the ruling dismissing the appeal after 13 years, the bench made this observation.

The bench introduced the order by saying the following: "Our country's judicial system can be used as punishment in and of itself! In this instance, it has exactly taken place. 14 years on the matter of aiding suicide in an incident where a student was disciplined for misconduct in the College and on trying to take disciplinary action and summon the father, albeit the parent did not show up and the child subsequently committed himself. regrettable circumstance"

The bench thought about the appeal and stated that, even after reading the charge sheet, there is still no proof of aiding suicide based on the current complaint. Finally, the accused was released after the appeal was accepted. This report deals with this aspect of the order.

V.P. Singh vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News