MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

common intention formed at the spur of the moment and during the occurrence itself - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Common Intention - among the co-perpetrators - formed at the spur of the moment and during the occurrence itself -  direct evidence not available - common intention has to be determined by drawing inference from the facts proved.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                                 NON-REPORTABLE

D.D-24Feb-2023

 

The State of Madhya Pradesh       …Appellant

Versus

Jad Bai                                        …Respondent

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.    586    OF 2023

(Arising from SLP(Criminal) No.8692/2022)

 

 Headnotes

Murder – Common Intention – Sect. 302, 34 IPC – Sect. 313 Cr.P.C. – Facts - FIR by the wife of the deceased - accused killed her husband - due to a land dispute – accused called the deceased to their house - respondent and her co-accused, husband, and son - convicted for the murder - life imprisonment - High Court acquitted the respondent while conviction of another accused upheld - state moved to Supreme Court.

Held - prosecution's case is based on the testimony of PW1 -testified - incident occurred in the house of the respondent – respondent’s husband caused four injuries on the deceased's head, and respondent caught hold of the deceased - dragged dead body and threw - participation of the respondent in the commission of the offence and her shared intention to kill the deceased have been established and proved by the prosecution.

Common Intention - among the co-perpetrators - formed at the spur of the moment and during the occurrence itself -  direct evidence not available - common intention has to be determined by drawing inference from the facts proved. Conviction Upheld. Appeal Allowed.

 

Latest Legal News