Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court

Calcutta High Court Declares Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings in West Bengal; Orders Fresh Assessment under Act of 2013

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, has ruled that the prolonged land acquisition case involving lands in Mouzas Natagarh, Sodepur, and Ghola has lapsed due to the failure to declare an award within the stipulated timeframe. The court directed a fresh acquisition and compensation assessment under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case, WPA 16342 of 2022, represented by Mr. Debayan Bera and Mr. Sakti Prasad Chakrabarti for the petitioners, and Mr. Chandi Charan De and Mr. Anirban Sarkar for the State, has a long history of litigation and administrative delays. The original acquisition proceedings under the Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, aimed at resettling migrants, remained incomplete without any declaration of award, sparking decades of legal battles for rightful compensation.

In his judgment, Justice Chatterjee observed, “The acquisition proceedings under the Act of 1948 have lapsed.” He further noted, “As per the ratiocination of this judgment, the provision of Section 11A of the Act I of 1894 has been included in the Act of 1948.” This pivotal observation aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Aziman Bibi & Ors., which applied Section 11A of Act-I of 1894 to such cases.

The court’s decision invalidates the previous compensation assessments and directs the respondent to initiate new acquisition proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the necessity to adhere to the legal provisions for timely completion of land acquisition processes and fair compensation. It also signifies a move towards more transparent and just procedures in land acquisition cases.

Date of Decision: 01 December 2023

Pabitra Kumar Dutta & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 

Latest Legal News