Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Calcutta High Court Declares Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings in West Bengal; Orders Fresh Assessment under Act of 2013

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, has ruled that the prolonged land acquisition case involving lands in Mouzas Natagarh, Sodepur, and Ghola has lapsed due to the failure to declare an award within the stipulated timeframe. The court directed a fresh acquisition and compensation assessment under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case, WPA 16342 of 2022, represented by Mr. Debayan Bera and Mr. Sakti Prasad Chakrabarti for the petitioners, and Mr. Chandi Charan De and Mr. Anirban Sarkar for the State, has a long history of litigation and administrative delays. The original acquisition proceedings under the Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, aimed at resettling migrants, remained incomplete without any declaration of award, sparking decades of legal battles for rightful compensation.

In his judgment, Justice Chatterjee observed, “The acquisition proceedings under the Act of 1948 have lapsed.” He further noted, “As per the ratiocination of this judgment, the provision of Section 11A of the Act I of 1894 has been included in the Act of 1948.” This pivotal observation aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Aziman Bibi & Ors., which applied Section 11A of Act-I of 1894 to such cases.

The court’s decision invalidates the previous compensation assessments and directs the respondent to initiate new acquisition proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the necessity to adhere to the legal provisions for timely completion of land acquisition processes and fair compensation. It also signifies a move towards more transparent and just procedures in land acquisition cases.

Date of Decision: 01 December 2023

Pabitra Kumar Dutta & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 

Latest Legal News