Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Calcutta High Court Declares Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings in West Bengal; Orders Fresh Assessment under Act of 2013

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, has ruled that the prolonged land acquisition case involving lands in Mouzas Natagarh, Sodepur, and Ghola has lapsed due to the failure to declare an award within the stipulated timeframe. The court directed a fresh acquisition and compensation assessment under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case, WPA 16342 of 2022, represented by Mr. Debayan Bera and Mr. Sakti Prasad Chakrabarti for the petitioners, and Mr. Chandi Charan De and Mr. Anirban Sarkar for the State, has a long history of litigation and administrative delays. The original acquisition proceedings under the Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, aimed at resettling migrants, remained incomplete without any declaration of award, sparking decades of legal battles for rightful compensation.

In his judgment, Justice Chatterjee observed, “The acquisition proceedings under the Act of 1948 have lapsed.” He further noted, “As per the ratiocination of this judgment, the provision of Section 11A of the Act I of 1894 has been included in the Act of 1948.” This pivotal observation aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Aziman Bibi & Ors., which applied Section 11A of Act-I of 1894 to such cases.

The court’s decision invalidates the previous compensation assessments and directs the respondent to initiate new acquisition proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the necessity to adhere to the legal provisions for timely completion of land acquisition processes and fair compensation. It also signifies a move towards more transparent and just procedures in land acquisition cases.

Date of Decision: 01 December 2023

Pabitra Kumar Dutta & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 

Latest Legal News