Claims For Recovery Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Supported By Probable Evidence; Exaggerated Claims Unsafe: Kerala High Court Naib Tahsildar Performing Quasi-Judicial Duties Is A 'Judge', Protected From Disciplinary Action For Bonafide Errors: Madhya Pradesh High Court Purchaser Estopped From Refusing Delivery Or Payment Of Statutory Taxes After Participating In Machinery Trial Runs: Madras High Court Presumption Of Marriage From Aadhaar, Passports Is Rebuttable; Long Silence Dislodges Marital Claim: Kerala High Court Government Cannot Deny Promotional Benefits To Employee Who Assumes Charge On The Date Of Superannuation: Karnataka High Court Disproportionate Assets 608% More Than Salary Establish 'Proceeds Of Crime' Prima Facie; No Mini-Trial At Discharge Stage: Jharkhand High Court Decree Based On 'Evasive Denial' Improper If Defendant Raises Specific Defenses Going To Root Of Case: J&K & Ladakh High Court Trial Courts Cannot Adjourn Ad-Interim Injunction Petitions For Months While Ordering 'Urgent Notice': Andhra Pradesh High Court Agent Of Court Receiver Who Breaches Undertaking On Nature Of Business Not Entitled To Occupy Premises Without Paying Royalty: Bombay High Court Criminal Antecedents Of A Witness Do Not Operate As Disqualification, Testimony To Be Assessed With Caution Not Suspicion: Calcutta High Court Bar On Raising Benami Defense Under Section 4 Applies To All Suits Filed After 1988 Act, Even For Past Transactions: Allahabad High Court Article 21 Can Trump UAPA Bail Restrictions In Cases Of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Activist Khuram Parvez Mere Possession Of Jihad Literature Not An Offence; Cannot Be Tagged With Terrorism Without Evidence Of Criminal Act: Telangana High Court

Calcutta High Court Declares Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings in West Bengal; Orders Fresh Assessment under Act of 2013

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, has ruled that the prolonged land acquisition case involving lands in Mouzas Natagarh, Sodepur, and Ghola has lapsed due to the failure to declare an award within the stipulated timeframe. The court directed a fresh acquisition and compensation assessment under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case, WPA 16342 of 2022, represented by Mr. Debayan Bera and Mr. Sakti Prasad Chakrabarti for the petitioners, and Mr. Chandi Charan De and Mr. Anirban Sarkar for the State, has a long history of litigation and administrative delays. The original acquisition proceedings under the Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, aimed at resettling migrants, remained incomplete without any declaration of award, sparking decades of legal battles for rightful compensation.

In his judgment, Justice Chatterjee observed, “The acquisition proceedings under the Act of 1948 have lapsed.” He further noted, “As per the ratiocination of this judgment, the provision of Section 11A of the Act I of 1894 has been included in the Act of 1948.” This pivotal observation aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Aziman Bibi & Ors., which applied Section 11A of Act-I of 1894 to such cases.

The court’s decision invalidates the previous compensation assessments and directs the respondent to initiate new acquisition proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the necessity to adhere to the legal provisions for timely completion of land acquisition processes and fair compensation. It also signifies a move towards more transparent and just procedures in land acquisition cases.

Date of Decision: 01 December 2023

Pabitra Kumar Dutta & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 

Latest Legal News