MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Calcutta High Court Declares Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings in West Bengal; Orders Fresh Assessment under Act of 2013

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, has ruled that the prolonged land acquisition case involving lands in Mouzas Natagarh, Sodepur, and Ghola has lapsed due to the failure to declare an award within the stipulated timeframe. The court directed a fresh acquisition and compensation assessment under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case, WPA 16342 of 2022, represented by Mr. Debayan Bera and Mr. Sakti Prasad Chakrabarti for the petitioners, and Mr. Chandi Charan De and Mr. Anirban Sarkar for the State, has a long history of litigation and administrative delays. The original acquisition proceedings under the Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, aimed at resettling migrants, remained incomplete without any declaration of award, sparking decades of legal battles for rightful compensation.

In his judgment, Justice Chatterjee observed, “The acquisition proceedings under the Act of 1948 have lapsed.” He further noted, “As per the ratiocination of this judgment, the provision of Section 11A of the Act I of 1894 has been included in the Act of 1948.” This pivotal observation aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Aziman Bibi & Ors., which applied Section 11A of Act-I of 1894 to such cases.

The court’s decision invalidates the previous compensation assessments and directs the respondent to initiate new acquisition proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the necessity to adhere to the legal provisions for timely completion of land acquisition processes and fair compensation. It also signifies a move towards more transparent and just procedures in land acquisition cases.

Date of Decision: 01 December 2023

Pabitra Kumar Dutta & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal 

Latest Legal News