Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Burden of proof lies with party disputing nature of transaction in registered sale deeds: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 4 May 2023, Supreme Court of India has held, in Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs Vs Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors., that a registered sale deed carries a presumption of being a genuine transaction, and the burden of proving otherwise lies with the party disputing the nature of the transaction. The case involved a dispute between two defendants, one of whom sold land to the other and subsequently sold the same land to a third party. The second defendant disputed the nature of the transaction with the third party, claiming that the first sale was made as collateral for a money lending transaction.

The Court, in its judgment, noted that the sale deed in question was registered and its execution was not in dispute, which carried a presumption of genuineness. The burden was thus on the second defendant to prove that the transaction did not reflect the true nature of the sale. The Court also observed that since the second defendant had not disputed the sale of one acre of land to the plaintiff as per the sale deed, the other contentions raised by the second defendant against the plaintiff were inconsequential and unnecessary to be gone into.

The Court further held that the validity of the sale deed executed by the second defendant in favour of the first defendant was not an issue that could be raised by the second defendant against the first defendant in the subject suit, as it would amount to adjudication of a claim by way of counter-claim by one defendant against their co-defendant. The Court also noted that the first defendant had not disputed the sale of the land to the plaintiff, and had in fact admitted the joint execution of the sale deed and receipt of sale consideration.

In light of these observations, the Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had restored the decree of dismissal of the suit of the trial court and restored the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge, Buldana. The Court allowed the appeal with costs.

This judgment provides important guidance on the presumption of genuineness that attaches to registered sale deeds and highlights the burden of proof that lies with parties disputing the nature of such transactions.

Subject: Civil Law - Validity of sale deed - Challenge by co-defendant - Inter-se dispute on validity of sale deed between co-defendants - Admissibility of parol evidence to show contract was never intended to be acted upon - Registration and admission of execution of sale deed carrying presumption of genuineness - Burden of proof on party disputing nature of transaction in registered sale deed.

May 04.2023

Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs Vs Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors.

Latest Legal News