Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence

Burden of proof lies with party disputing nature of transaction in registered sale deeds: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 4 May 2023, Supreme Court of India has held, in Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs Vs Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors., that a registered sale deed carries a presumption of being a genuine transaction, and the burden of proving otherwise lies with the party disputing the nature of the transaction. The case involved a dispute between two defendants, one of whom sold land to the other and subsequently sold the same land to a third party. The second defendant disputed the nature of the transaction with the third party, claiming that the first sale was made as collateral for a money lending transaction.

The Court, in its judgment, noted that the sale deed in question was registered and its execution was not in dispute, which carried a presumption of genuineness. The burden was thus on the second defendant to prove that the transaction did not reflect the true nature of the sale. The Court also observed that since the second defendant had not disputed the sale of one acre of land to the plaintiff as per the sale deed, the other contentions raised by the second defendant against the plaintiff were inconsequential and unnecessary to be gone into.

The Court further held that the validity of the sale deed executed by the second defendant in favour of the first defendant was not an issue that could be raised by the second defendant against the first defendant in the subject suit, as it would amount to adjudication of a claim by way of counter-claim by one defendant against their co-defendant. The Court also noted that the first defendant had not disputed the sale of the land to the plaintiff, and had in fact admitted the joint execution of the sale deed and receipt of sale consideration.

In light of these observations, the Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had restored the decree of dismissal of the suit of the trial court and restored the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge, Buldana. The Court allowed the appeal with costs.

This judgment provides important guidance on the presumption of genuineness that attaches to registered sale deeds and highlights the burden of proof that lies with parties disputing the nature of such transactions.

Subject: Civil Law - Validity of sale deed - Challenge by co-defendant - Inter-se dispute on validity of sale deed between co-defendants - Admissibility of parol evidence to show contract was never intended to be acted upon - Registration and admission of execution of sale deed carrying presumption of genuineness - Burden of proof on party disputing nature of transaction in registered sale deed.

May 04.2023

Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs Vs Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors.

Latest Legal News