Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Bail to Pregnant Wife in Abetment of Suicide Case-BOMBAY HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

A pregnant woman was recently granted anticipatory bail by the Bombay High Court on charges of assisting her husband's suicide.

The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

The court was hearing a woman's application for anticipatory bail filed on April 16 in connection with a criminal complaint filed against her in Pune on April 16.

According to the facts of the case, Rahul and the applicant had been married for eight months before Rahul's body was discovered near railway tracks in Pune.

It was alleged that he left a suicide note in which he blamed his wife for his death and demanded that she be punished.

The judge noted in the initial report of suspicious activity (FIR) that the husband was dissatisfied with his wife's constant phone use.

"This individual has yet to be identified. It could be a member of her family, such as her parents or siblings, or a third party. It is understood that the applicant was already 3.5 months pregnant at the time. There are phone numbers in the alleged dying declaration (written note) that the prosecution must investigate "The judge observed.

In his May 30 order, Justice Jadhav stated that the applicant was charged with a heinous crime that, if she is found guilty, could result in a sentence of ten years of solitary confinement.

"However, given that the applicant is 25 weeks pregnant and carrying a fetus, it is also the Court's responsibility to ensure that she and the fetus are protected at this stage and that she is not subjected to duress or stress," the judge said.

The Court added that, given her current medical condition, she may be required to visit the hospital frequently and will require proper care and rest.

In granting her pre-arrest bail, the judge stated, "Her presence can always be secured by the prosecution and the Investigating Officer, and if necessary, the Investigating Officer can also visit her in consideration of her medical condition."

The applicant was represented by attorneys Vivek Rane and Vijay Latange, while the State was represented by additional public prosecutor M R Tidke.

Latest Legal News