CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Bail to Pregnant Wife in Abetment of Suicide Case-BOMBAY HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

A pregnant woman was recently granted anticipatory bail by the Bombay High Court on charges of assisting her husband's suicide.

The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

The court was hearing a woman's application for anticipatory bail filed on April 16 in connection with a criminal complaint filed against her in Pune on April 16.

According to the facts of the case, Rahul and the applicant had been married for eight months before Rahul's body was discovered near railway tracks in Pune.

It was alleged that he left a suicide note in which he blamed his wife for his death and demanded that she be punished.

The judge noted in the initial report of suspicious activity (FIR) that the husband was dissatisfied with his wife's constant phone use.

"This individual has yet to be identified. It could be a member of her family, such as her parents or siblings, or a third party. It is understood that the applicant was already 3.5 months pregnant at the time. There are phone numbers in the alleged dying declaration (written note) that the prosecution must investigate "The judge observed.

In his May 30 order, Justice Jadhav stated that the applicant was charged with a heinous crime that, if she is found guilty, could result in a sentence of ten years of solitary confinement.

"However, given that the applicant is 25 weeks pregnant and carrying a fetus, it is also the Court's responsibility to ensure that she and the fetus are protected at this stage and that she is not subjected to duress or stress," the judge said.

The Court added that, given her current medical condition, she may be required to visit the hospital frequently and will require proper care and rest.

In granting her pre-arrest bail, the judge stated, "Her presence can always be secured by the prosecution and the Investigating Officer, and if necessary, the Investigating Officer can also visit her in consideration of her medical condition."

The applicant was represented by attorneys Vivek Rane and Vijay Latange, while the State was represented by additional public prosecutor M R Tidke.

Latest Legal News