Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Bail to Pregnant Wife in Abetment of Suicide Case-BOMBAY HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

A pregnant woman was recently granted anticipatory bail by the Bombay High Court on charges of assisting her husband's suicide.

The sole judge, Milind Jadhav, noted that the woman was in her 25th week of pregnancy and should not be subjected to stress.

The court was hearing a woman's application for anticipatory bail filed on April 16 in connection with a criminal complaint filed against her in Pune on April 16.

According to the facts of the case, Rahul and the applicant had been married for eight months before Rahul's body was discovered near railway tracks in Pune.

It was alleged that he left a suicide note in which he blamed his wife for his death and demanded that she be punished.

The judge noted in the initial report of suspicious activity (FIR) that the husband was dissatisfied with his wife's constant phone use.

"This individual has yet to be identified. It could be a member of her family, such as her parents or siblings, or a third party. It is understood that the applicant was already 3.5 months pregnant at the time. There are phone numbers in the alleged dying declaration (written note) that the prosecution must investigate "The judge observed.

In his May 30 order, Justice Jadhav stated that the applicant was charged with a heinous crime that, if she is found guilty, could result in a sentence of ten years of solitary confinement.

"However, given that the applicant is 25 weeks pregnant and carrying a fetus, it is also the Court's responsibility to ensure that she and the fetus are protected at this stage and that she is not subjected to duress or stress," the judge said.

The Court added that, given her current medical condition, she may be required to visit the hospital frequently and will require proper care and rest.

In granting her pre-arrest bail, the judge stated, "Her presence can always be secured by the prosecution and the Investigating Officer, and if necessary, the Investigating Officer can also visit her in consideration of her medical condition."

The applicant was represented by attorneys Vivek Rane and Vijay Latange, while the State was represented by additional public prosecutor M R Tidke.

Latest Legal News