Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Bail, Not Jail, Should Be the Norm: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Act Accused After 7 Months of Incarceration

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the principles of personal liberty, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to an accused in a case involving possession of a narcotic substance. The Court's decision came in the case of Davinder Singh Alias Baba vs. State of Punjab, emphasizing the maxim that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception," a tenet established by the Supreme Court in its landmark judgments.

Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, presiding over the matter, allowed the bail application of the petitioner, who had been under arrest for over 7 months in connection with possession of Alprazolam, marginally higher than the commercial quantity defined under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Davinder Singh, was initially granted interim bail but failed to reappear, leading to his proclamation as an offender and subsequent re-arrest. His counsel argued that Singh had not been involved in any other criminal activities of a similar nature during the interim period and had already faced considerable incarceration.

In his ruling, Justice Tiwari noted, "The right to a speedy trial is one of the rights of a detained person. However, while deciding the application for regular bail, the Courts shall also take into consideration the fundamental precept of criminal jurisprudence, which is 'the presumption of innocence', besides the gravity of offence(s) involved."

The Court further observed that the petitioner had already suffered incarceration for 07 months and 09 days, and most of the prosecution witnesses had been examined, justifying the grant of bail.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2024

DAVINDER SINGH ALIAS BABA VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Similar News