No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a recent judgment, reaffirmed the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence, stating, “Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.” The judgment, delivered by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI on December 2, 2023, granted regular bail to the petitioner in a cross-case involving multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case, registered under Sections 452, 326, 323, 325, 427, 506, 148, and 149 IPC, stemmed from a dispute that took place on January 13, 2023. The petitioner, SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA, sought bail after being in custody for over six months.

In the judgment, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing individual liberty and society’s interests when granting or refusing bail. It stated, “The society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail because every criminal offence is the offence against the State. The order granting or refusing bail must reflect a perfect balance between the conflicting interests, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the society.”

The Court also took into account the delay in framing charges, the trivial nature of the incident, and the fact that all other co-accused except the petitioner had been granted bail. The judgment highlighted the need for a fair and balanced approach in bail decisions.

As a result of the judgment, SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA was granted regular bail with certain conditions. He is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

The Court, while allowing bail, cautioned against future commission of similar offenses by the petitioner. It clarified that its observations in the judgment have no impact on the merits of the trial and are meant for deciding the bail application only.

Date of Decision: December 02, 2023

SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News