Accused Loses Right To Default Bail By Acquiescence If Extension Orders Are Challenged Only After Chargesheet Filing: Supreme Court AP High Court Orders Release Of Vehicle Seized For Mineral Transport Violations Upon Payment Of Penalty, Says Rules Don't Mandate Indefinite Detention Short Time Gap Between 'Last Seen' And Death Clinches Murder Conviction Against Fired Driver: Allahabad High Court Court Must Restore Possession To Dispossessed Party If Ex-Parte Decree Is Set Aside Even If Property Descriptions Differ: Andhra Pradesh High Court Management Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointment Citing Delay If It Failed To Maintain Service Records: Calcutta High Court Long Possession Alone Does Not Establish Tenancy; Burden Of Proof Lies On Person Claiming Status Of Tenant: Bombay High Court Consent Of Minor Immaterial: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction But Acquits Man Of Kidnapping Charges Notional Income Of Minor In Motor Accident Claims Must Be Based On Minimum Wages Of Skilled Workmen: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹56.8 Lakhs Revenue Records Serve Only Fiscal Purpose, Cannot Be Treated As Proof Of Title To Property: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Grant 'Deemed Extension' Of Time For Deposit In Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Not Deposited Within Stipulated Time: Supreme Court Supreme Court Protects MSMEs From Closure Over Missing Environmental Clearance If Pollution Boards Were Unaware Of Requirement Industrial Units Operating With Valid PCB Consents Can't Be Closed Merely For Technical Want Of Prior Environmental Clearance: Supreme Court Punishment On Charge Not Framed In Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Reduces Doctor's Penalty To Censure Plea Of Acquiescence Cannot Defeat Lawful Title Claim When Encroachment Is Established: Madras High Court Board Of Revenue Can't Quash Unchallenged Orders While Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Penetration To Any Extent Sufficient For Offence Under POCSO Act; Intact Hymen No Bar For Conviction: Meghalaya High Court Expeditious Conclusion Of Summary Force Court Trial Not Arbitrary If Procedure Followed; ITBPF Act Self-Contained: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Doesn't Bar Appeal Filed Prior To Withdrawal Of Earlier Defective Appeal Against Same Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court Appointment Of Receiver Is An 'Extreme Remedy', Cannot Be Ordered Lightly Especially After Decades Of Inaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a recent judgment, reaffirmed the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence, stating, “Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.” The judgment, delivered by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI on December 2, 2023, granted regular bail to the petitioner in a cross-case involving multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case, registered under Sections 452, 326, 323, 325, 427, 506, 148, and 149 IPC, stemmed from a dispute that took place on January 13, 2023. The petitioner, SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA, sought bail after being in custody for over six months.

In the judgment, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing individual liberty and society’s interests when granting or refusing bail. It stated, “The society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail because every criminal offence is the offence against the State. The order granting or refusing bail must reflect a perfect balance between the conflicting interests, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the society.”

The Court also took into account the delay in framing charges, the trivial nature of the incident, and the fact that all other co-accused except the petitioner had been granted bail. The judgment highlighted the need for a fair and balanced approach in bail decisions.

As a result of the judgment, SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA was granted regular bail with certain conditions. He is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

The Court, while allowing bail, cautioned against future commission of similar offenses by the petitioner. It clarified that its observations in the judgment have no impact on the merits of the trial and are meant for deciding the bail application only.

Date of Decision: December 02, 2023

SURJEET SINGH @ GOLA VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News