NDPS | Mentioning FIR Number On Memos Before Registration Makes the Entire Recovery Suspect: Himachal Pradesh High Court MACT | Once Deceased Is Proven To Be Skilled Worker, Deputy Commissioner's Wage Notification Is Applicable: P&H HC Bank’s Technical Excuses Can’t Override Employee’s Right to Ex Gratia Under Old Circulars: Bombay High Court Slams Canara Bank’s Rejection of Claim Once Worker Files Affidavit of Unemployment, Burden Shifts to Employer to Prove Gainful Employment: Delhi High Court Grants 17B Relief Despite 12-Year Delay Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Limitation Act | Quasi-Judicial Bodies Cannot Invoke Section 5 Principles Without Express Statutory Grant: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Commencement of Proceedings Triggered by Notice Receipt, Not Section 11 Filing: Supreme Court Strong and Cogent Evidence Must Exist at the Threshold to Deny Bail Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court Appellate Court Under Section 37 Cannot Sit in Appeal Over Arbitral Award on Merits: Supreme Court Affidavit Ratifying Power of Attorney Cannot Be Disowned Later: Supreme Court Orders Specific Performance Despite Earlier Revocation Claims No Law Empowers a Corporation to Haunt a Retiree: Supreme Court Quashes Post-Retirement Disciplinary Action for Want of Jurisdiction Mere Expectation of Higher Bids Can't Justify Cancelling a Valid Auction: Supreme Court Quashes GDA’s Arbitrary Rejection of Highest Bidder Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21, Even in Grave Economic Offences: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Arvind Dham in ₹673 Crore PMLA Case Article 14 | ‘Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midstream’: Supreme Court Quashes Punjab’s Modified Sports Quota Policy for MBBS Admissions Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midway: Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Retrospective Recruitment Amendment "Imaginary Ghost" - Court Permits Karthigai Deepam at Thiruparankundram ‘Deepathoon’: Madras High Court 353 IPC | Continuing Prosecution Against Citizens Despite Statutory Findings of Police Atrocities Is Abuse of Process: Kerala High Court Court Cannot Compel Plaintiff to Continue Suit Where No Liberty to File Fresh Suit is Sought: Bombay High Court Claim for Demurrage is Not a Crystallized Debt—Only an Unadjudicated Right to Sue: Andhra Pradesh High Court Declared Foreign Nationals Have No Right to Reside in India: Gauhati High Court Upholds Expulsion of Bangladeshi Woman Without Requiring Deportation Protocols

Bail In Immoral Trafficking Case: Lack of Forcible Induction into Prostitution: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Karnataka High Court, under the jurisdiction of The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, delivered a judgment on 29th November, 2023, granting bail to the petitioner in a case involving a multitude of charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, and the Information Technology Act. The court's decision highlighted a crucial legal point regarding the absence of evidence suggesting forcible induction into prostitution.

The judgment emphasized that the petitioner, accused in Crime No. 363/2023 registered by Bagalagunte Police Station, Bengaluru City, faced allegations related to Sections 370, 370A(2), 370(3), 34 IPC, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956, and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The court's observation was clear in stating that the rescued ladies, who were found in the premises during a police raid, were not forcibly induced into prostitution. Furthermore, the judgment noted that the alleged offenses were not exclusively punishable by life imprisonment or death. It also highlighted that a significant portion of the investigation had already been completed.

The court's decision to grant bail was seen as a favorable outcome for the petitioner, who had no prior criminal record. In light of this, the court imposed specific conditions as part of the bail, including the execution of a personal bond with sureties, mandatory appearance on all hearing dates, prohibition from threatening witnesses or engaging in similar offenses, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 29 November, 2023

MANJUNATH @ SHANTHI  VS  STATE OF KARNATAKA 

Latest Legal News