Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court

Bail In Immoral Trafficking Case: Lack of Forcible Induction into Prostitution: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Karnataka High Court, under the jurisdiction of The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, delivered a judgment on 29th November, 2023, granting bail to the petitioner in a case involving a multitude of charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, and the Information Technology Act. The court's decision highlighted a crucial legal point regarding the absence of evidence suggesting forcible induction into prostitution.

The judgment emphasized that the petitioner, accused in Crime No. 363/2023 registered by Bagalagunte Police Station, Bengaluru City, faced allegations related to Sections 370, 370A(2), 370(3), 34 IPC, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956, and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The court's observation was clear in stating that the rescued ladies, who were found in the premises during a police raid, were not forcibly induced into prostitution. Furthermore, the judgment noted that the alleged offenses were not exclusively punishable by life imprisonment or death. It also highlighted that a significant portion of the investigation had already been completed.

The court's decision to grant bail was seen as a favorable outcome for the petitioner, who had no prior criminal record. In light of this, the court imposed specific conditions as part of the bail, including the execution of a personal bond with sureties, mandatory appearance on all hearing dates, prohibition from threatening witnesses or engaging in similar offenses, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 29 November, 2023

MANJUNATH @ SHANTHI  VS  STATE OF KARNATAKA 

Latest Legal News