Accused Loses Right To Default Bail By Acquiescence If Extension Orders Are Challenged Only After Chargesheet Filing: Supreme Court AP High Court Orders Release Of Vehicle Seized For Mineral Transport Violations Upon Payment Of Penalty, Says Rules Don't Mandate Indefinite Detention Short Time Gap Between 'Last Seen' And Death Clinches Murder Conviction Against Fired Driver: Allahabad High Court Court Must Restore Possession To Dispossessed Party If Ex-Parte Decree Is Set Aside Even If Property Descriptions Differ: Andhra Pradesh High Court Management Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointment Citing Delay If It Failed To Maintain Service Records: Calcutta High Court Long Possession Alone Does Not Establish Tenancy; Burden Of Proof Lies On Person Claiming Status Of Tenant: Bombay High Court Consent Of Minor Immaterial: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction But Acquits Man Of Kidnapping Charges Notional Income Of Minor In Motor Accident Claims Must Be Based On Minimum Wages Of Skilled Workmen: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹56.8 Lakhs Revenue Records Serve Only Fiscal Purpose, Cannot Be Treated As Proof Of Title To Property: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Grant 'Deemed Extension' Of Time For Deposit In Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Not Deposited Within Stipulated Time: Supreme Court Supreme Court Protects MSMEs From Closure Over Missing Environmental Clearance If Pollution Boards Were Unaware Of Requirement Industrial Units Operating With Valid PCB Consents Can't Be Closed Merely For Technical Want Of Prior Environmental Clearance: Supreme Court Punishment On Charge Not Framed In Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Reduces Doctor's Penalty To Censure Plea Of Acquiescence Cannot Defeat Lawful Title Claim When Encroachment Is Established: Madras High Court Board Of Revenue Can't Quash Unchallenged Orders While Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Penetration To Any Extent Sufficient For Offence Under POCSO Act; Intact Hymen No Bar For Conviction: Meghalaya High Court Expeditious Conclusion Of Summary Force Court Trial Not Arbitrary If Procedure Followed; ITBPF Act Self-Contained: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Doesn't Bar Appeal Filed Prior To Withdrawal Of Earlier Defective Appeal Against Same Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court Appointment Of Receiver Is An 'Extreme Remedy', Cannot Be Ordered Lightly Especially After Decades Of Inaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Bail In Immoral Trafficking Case: Lack of Forcible Induction into Prostitution: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Karnataka High Court, under the jurisdiction of The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, delivered a judgment on 29th November, 2023, granting bail to the petitioner in a case involving a multitude of charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, and the Information Technology Act. The court's decision highlighted a crucial legal point regarding the absence of evidence suggesting forcible induction into prostitution.

The judgment emphasized that the petitioner, accused in Crime No. 363/2023 registered by Bagalagunte Police Station, Bengaluru City, faced allegations related to Sections 370, 370A(2), 370(3), 34 IPC, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956, and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The court's observation was clear in stating that the rescued ladies, who were found in the premises during a police raid, were not forcibly induced into prostitution. Furthermore, the judgment noted that the alleged offenses were not exclusively punishable by life imprisonment or death. It also highlighted that a significant portion of the investigation had already been completed.

The court's decision to grant bail was seen as a favorable outcome for the petitioner, who had no prior criminal record. In light of this, the court imposed specific conditions as part of the bail, including the execution of a personal bond with sureties, mandatory appearance on all hearing dates, prohibition from threatening witnesses or engaging in similar offenses, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 29 November, 2023

MANJUNATH @ SHANTHI  VS  STATE OF KARNATAKA 

Latest Legal News