Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Bail applications shouldn't exceed 10 minutes- Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court ruled that bail hearings shouldn't last longer than ten minutes.

The court's time is being wasted, according to a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and AS Oka, during lengthy bail proceedings that take days.

The comments were made at a hearing on a plea filed by JNU student Sharjeel Imam, who urged the Supreme Court to overturn comments the Delhi High Court made about him in its decision to refuse co-defendant Umar Khalid bail in the Delhi Riots Conspiracy case.

Imam was referred to by the Delhi High Court as "arguably the head of the scheme" when it denied Khalid bail.

Imam claims that these statements were made against natural justice principles without allowing him a chance to be heard and without any evidence being on file.

According to the Court today, when bail matters are thoroughly heard, as though the Court is hearing a final appeal against conviction, such observations creep into the judgement.

After hearing Khalid's bail request for more than 20 days, the court refused it while also making comments on Imam.

The Delhi High Court's views regarding Imam's role will not in any way harm him, the court ruled today after granting Imam's petition.

Latest Legal News