Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Allegations So Absurd and Improbable: Madras High Court Quashes Frivolous Property Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, has quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.81 of 2019 against M.K. Suppuroyal, citing the allegations as “absurd and inherently improbable.” The decision pronounced on January 18, 2024, by Justice R. Sakthivel, underlines the misuse of the legal process in a property dispute.

The case involved a complex property dispute following the demise of property owner V.J. Thomas, leading to a series of legal battles among the legal heirs and the tenants, including the petitioner. The petitioner, a tenant and the sole accused in the criminal case, was embroiled in a legal tussle over the property’s ownership and possession, leading to multiple criminal allegations by the parties involved.

 

Justice R. Sakthivel, in his judgement, remarked on the lack of substantial evidence and prima facie improbability in the allegations made against the petitioner. “The allegation made in the complaint are so absurd, incorrect and improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient grounds for proceeding against the petitioner,” the Court observed.

The Court further noted the non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of filing an affidavit in a 156(3) petition as established in the Priyanka Srivastava case. However, it was deemed sufficient that the Judicial Magistrate recorded the statement of the respondent/complainant.

Referencing the landmark judgement of State of Haryana and Others v. Bhajan Lal, Justice Sakthivel applied the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court to quash the prosecution, categorizing the case under the guideline where allegations in the FIR are so absurd and inherently improbable.

The Court’s decision to quash the proceedings was seen as a reinforcement of legal principles against the abuse of law and baseless allegations. This ruling has been hailed as a significant step in preventing the misuse of the judicial process in property disputes and ensuring that the law is not used as a tool for personal vendettas. The judgement sends a clear message against the frivolous litigation that clogs the judicial system and underlines the importance of factual accuracy and legal probity in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 18th January 2024

M.K.Suppuroyal VS Abdul Pari

 

Similar News