Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Allegations So Absurd and Improbable: Madras High Court Quashes Frivolous Property Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, has quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.81 of 2019 against M.K. Suppuroyal, citing the allegations as “absurd and inherently improbable.” The decision pronounced on January 18, 2024, by Justice R. Sakthivel, underlines the misuse of the legal process in a property dispute.

The case involved a complex property dispute following the demise of property owner V.J. Thomas, leading to a series of legal battles among the legal heirs and the tenants, including the petitioner. The petitioner, a tenant and the sole accused in the criminal case, was embroiled in a legal tussle over the property’s ownership and possession, leading to multiple criminal allegations by the parties involved.

 

Justice R. Sakthivel, in his judgement, remarked on the lack of substantial evidence and prima facie improbability in the allegations made against the petitioner. “The allegation made in the complaint are so absurd, incorrect and improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient grounds for proceeding against the petitioner,” the Court observed.

The Court further noted the non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of filing an affidavit in a 156(3) petition as established in the Priyanka Srivastava case. However, it was deemed sufficient that the Judicial Magistrate recorded the statement of the respondent/complainant.

Referencing the landmark judgement of State of Haryana and Others v. Bhajan Lal, Justice Sakthivel applied the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court to quash the prosecution, categorizing the case under the guideline where allegations in the FIR are so absurd and inherently improbable.

The Court’s decision to quash the proceedings was seen as a reinforcement of legal principles against the abuse of law and baseless allegations. This ruling has been hailed as a significant step in preventing the misuse of the judicial process in property disputes and ensuring that the law is not used as a tool for personal vendettas. The judgement sends a clear message against the frivolous litigation that clogs the judicial system and underlines the importance of factual accuracy and legal probity in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 18th January 2024

M.K.Suppuroyal VS Abdul Pari

 

Latest Legal News