Multiple NDPS Cases Without Conviction Cannot Justify Indefinite Pre-Trial Custody: Himachal Pradesh HC Grants Bail in Heroin Case Departmental Findings Based On Witnesses Discredited By Criminal Court Constitute 'No Evidence': Orissa High Court Upheld Constable's Reinstatement When Pension Rules Are Capable of More Than One Interpretation, Courts Must Lean in Favour of the Employee: MP High Court Wife Left Voluntarily — But Minor Children Cannot Be Taken Away: Madras High Court Intervenes in Habeas Corpus for Two Toddlers Where Consideration Does Not Pass in Terms of the Sale Deed, the Sale Deed Is Null and Void, a Nullity and Dead Letter in the Eyes of Law: Jharkhand High Court National Award-Winning Director's Script Was Registered Two Years Before Complainant Even Wrote His — Supreme Court Quashes Copyright Infringement Case Against 'Kahaani-2' Director IBC Clean Slate Does Not Wipe Out Right of Set-Off as Defence: Supreme Court Draws Critical Distinction Between Counterclaim and Defensive Plea GST Assessment Challenged on Natural Justice Grounds Tagged to Criminal Writ in Supreme Court Railway Cannot Escape Compensation by Crying 'Trespass' Without Eyewitness: Bombay High Court Reverses Tribunal, Awards Rs. 4 Lakh to Widow of Rolex Employee Master Plan Cannot Be Held Hostage to Subsequent Vegetation Growth — Supreme Court Settles Deemed Forest vs. Statutory Planning Conflict Contempt | Sold Property Despite Court's Restraint Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sentences One Month's Imprisonment Tractor-Run-Over Death Was An Accident, Not Murder: Allahabad High Court Acquits Three Accused Fast-Tracking Cannot Bury Justice: Supreme Court Sets Aside 21-Year-Delayed Appeal Decided Without Informing Convict Panchayat Act's Demolition Powers Cease Once Plot Falls Under Development Authority's Planning Area: Calcutta High Court Actual Date Of Woman Director's Appointment A Triable Issue; Prosecution Can't Be Quashed Merely On Claims Of Compliance: Calcutta High Court A Website Cannot Whisper and Then Punish: Delhi High Court Reins in DSSSB Over E-Dossier Rejections Mutual Consent Alone Ends the Marriage: Gujarat High Court Affirms Mubarat Divorce Without Formalities State Cannot Hide Behind "Oral Consent" or Delay When It Builds Roads Through Citizens' Land Without Due Process: Himachal Pradesh HC Show Cause Notice Alone Cannot Cut a Retired Engineer's Pension: Jharkhand High Court Bovine Smuggling Is a Law and Order Problem, Not a Public Order Threat: J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Article 22(2) Constitution | Production Beyond 24 Hours Not Fatal If Delay Explained And Travel Time Excluded: Karnataka High Court Article 227 Is Not an Appellate Power: High Court Refuses to Reassess Tribunal Findings on Pension Claim: Kerala High Court High Court Cannot Call A Complaint "False And Malicious" Without First Finding It Discloses No Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court When Jurisdiction Fails, Remand Cannot Cure It: Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Sending MSME Award Dispute Back to Functus Officio Facilitation Council Selling Inferior Pipes as 'Jain' or 'Jindal Gold' Brand Is Not Just a Civil Wrong — It's Cheating: MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Went to Collect Chit Fund Money, Got Arrested in Prostitution Raid: Telangana High Court Grants Bail to Woman Accused of Being Sub-Organiser Axe Blow During Sudden Quarrel Falls Under Exception 4 To Section 300 IPC, Not Murder: Orissa High Court Modifies Conviction To Culpable Homicide

Allahabad HC Directs Authorities to Decide on NEET Candidate's Refund Application for Rs. 2 Lakh Security Deposit

09 October 2024 1:27 PM

By: sayum


Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), in Talha Khan vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Edu. Lko & Ors., directed the Director General of Medical Education and Training, U.P., to resolve the petitioner's application for a refund of a Rs. 2,00,000/- security deposit. The petitioner had participated in the NEET (UG) counseling for the academic session 2022-23 but was not allocated any institution, leading to the claim for a refund.

The petitioner, Talha Khan, had deposited Rs. 2,00,000/- as a security amount for participating in the NEET (UG) counseling for the academic session 2022-23. Despite not being allocated any institution, his repeated representations for a refund were ignored. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a court directive to the authorities to refund the security deposit.

The core issue revolved around the failure of the respondent authorities to address the petitioner's application for a refund of the security deposit. The petitioner had not been allocated any institution in the counseling process, yet his security deposit remained unreturned. The court noted that the respondents had no objection to the request for a decision on the refund application.

The court did not delve into the merits of the case but directed the respondent authorities to resolve the petitioner's refund claim promptly. Justice Alok Mathur ordered the Director General, Medical Education and Training, U.P., to decide the petitioner's representation dated August 3, 2023, within six weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

The court's order ensures that the petitioner's long-pending request for a refund will be addressed promptly. The decision underscores the court's role in enforcing procedural fairness in cases involving delays in administrative actions.

Date of Decision: September 17, 2024

Talha Khan vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Edu. Lko & Ors

Latest Legal News