Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

All Appointments of Teachers In West Bengal Made Through The Tainted 2016 Selection Process Are Declared Null And Void: Investigation Handed Over To CBI: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive judgment dated 22 April 2024, the Calcutta High Court declared all appointments made through the 2016 selection process conducted by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission (SSC) as null and void, citing violations of constitutional provisions. This ruling followed a detailed scrutiny into numerous irregularities and illegalities within the recruitment process. Investigation handed over to CBI .

The court highlighted that the entire selection process was plagued by severe breaches of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which protect equality before the law and equal opportunities in public employment. The decision is seen as a reaffirmation of judicial oversight in ensuring transparency and fairness in public recruitment processes.

The scrutiny into the SSC's 2016 recruitment process began after various discrepancies were reported, prompting multiple legal challenges. The investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), as directed by earlier court orders, revealed systemic manipulations including tampered OMR sheets and appointments made against expired panels.

The bench, consisting of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi, meticulously reviewed the findings of the CBI investigation and the SSC's responses. The court noted the deep-seated corruption and manipulation designed to obfuscate the illegalities, stating, "The entire selection process is shrouded in such mystery and in such layers that it is difficult to fathom the quantum of illegalities performed."

Highlighting the calculated malfeasance, the court observed, "The entire machinery was devised for the purpose of effectuating a scam which will be hard to discover and even if discovered difficult to prove," emphasizing the complexity and depth of the corruption involved.

The appointments were annulled, and the court ordered a fresh, transparent reselection process under strict adherence to recruitment rules. Additionally, the CBI has been tasked with further investigations into individuals who benefited from the scam, including possible custodial interrogations to uncover the full extent of the manipulations.

Date of Decision: 22 April 2024

Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee) & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News