Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction When Death Is Caused by an Unforeseeable Forest Fire, Criminal Prosecution Cannot Be Sustained Without Proof of Rashness, Negligence, or Knowledge: Supreme Court Proof of Accident Alone is Not Enough – Claimants Must Prove Involvement of Offending Vehicle Under Section 166 MV Act: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Compensation in Fatal Road Accident Case Income Tax | Search Means Search, Not ‘Other Person’: Section 153C Collapses When the Assessee Himself Is Searched: Karnataka High Court Draws a Clear Red Line License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD"

All Appointments of Teachers In West Bengal Made Through The Tainted 2016 Selection Process Are Declared Null And Void: Investigation Handed Over To CBI: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive judgment dated 22 April 2024, the Calcutta High Court declared all appointments made through the 2016 selection process conducted by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission (SSC) as null and void, citing violations of constitutional provisions. This ruling followed a detailed scrutiny into numerous irregularities and illegalities within the recruitment process. Investigation handed over to CBI .

The court highlighted that the entire selection process was plagued by severe breaches of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which protect equality before the law and equal opportunities in public employment. The decision is seen as a reaffirmation of judicial oversight in ensuring transparency and fairness in public recruitment processes.

The scrutiny into the SSC's 2016 recruitment process began after various discrepancies were reported, prompting multiple legal challenges. The investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), as directed by earlier court orders, revealed systemic manipulations including tampered OMR sheets and appointments made against expired panels.

The bench, consisting of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi, meticulously reviewed the findings of the CBI investigation and the SSC's responses. The court noted the deep-seated corruption and manipulation designed to obfuscate the illegalities, stating, "The entire selection process is shrouded in such mystery and in such layers that it is difficult to fathom the quantum of illegalities performed."

Highlighting the calculated malfeasance, the court observed, "The entire machinery was devised for the purpose of effectuating a scam which will be hard to discover and even if discovered difficult to prove," emphasizing the complexity and depth of the corruption involved.

The appointments were annulled, and the court ordered a fresh, transparent reselection process under strict adherence to recruitment rules. Additionally, the CBI has been tasked with further investigations into individuals who benefited from the scam, including possible custodial interrogations to uncover the full extent of the manipulations.

Date of Decision: 22 April 2024

Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee) & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News