Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

All Appointments of Teachers In West Bengal Made Through The Tainted 2016 Selection Process Are Declared Null And Void: Investigation Handed Over To CBI: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive judgment dated 22 April 2024, the Calcutta High Court declared all appointments made through the 2016 selection process conducted by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission (SSC) as null and void, citing violations of constitutional provisions. This ruling followed a detailed scrutiny into numerous irregularities and illegalities within the recruitment process. Investigation handed over to CBI .

The court highlighted that the entire selection process was plagued by severe breaches of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which protect equality before the law and equal opportunities in public employment. The decision is seen as a reaffirmation of judicial oversight in ensuring transparency and fairness in public recruitment processes.

The scrutiny into the SSC's 2016 recruitment process began after various discrepancies were reported, prompting multiple legal challenges. The investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), as directed by earlier court orders, revealed systemic manipulations including tampered OMR sheets and appointments made against expired panels.

The bench, consisting of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi, meticulously reviewed the findings of the CBI investigation and the SSC's responses. The court noted the deep-seated corruption and manipulation designed to obfuscate the illegalities, stating, "The entire selection process is shrouded in such mystery and in such layers that it is difficult to fathom the quantum of illegalities performed."

Highlighting the calculated malfeasance, the court observed, "The entire machinery was devised for the purpose of effectuating a scam which will be hard to discover and even if discovered difficult to prove," emphasizing the complexity and depth of the corruption involved.

The appointments were annulled, and the court ordered a fresh, transparent reselection process under strict adherence to recruitment rules. Additionally, the CBI has been tasked with further investigations into individuals who benefited from the scam, including possible custodial interrogations to uncover the full extent of the manipulations.

Date of Decision: 22 April 2024

Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee) & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Similar News