Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Adverse Possession - Continuous, And Hostile Possession, Accompanied By Animus Possidendi - Claim Denied By Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


August 9, 2023 - In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a claim of adverse possession made by the respondents over government-owned land. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, highlighted the necessity of establishing clear, continuous, and hostile possession, accompanied by animus possidendi, for adverse possession claims, especially concerning government property.

”The burden of proof once shifted, it was for the claimants to prove their possession to be openly hostile to the rights of the government.”

The court emphasized that mere long-term possession is insufficient to substantiate a claim of adverse possession. “Surmises, conjectures, and approximations cannot serve as a basis for transferring ownership of state land to one who has no such rights,” the bench stated. The court also stressed the importance of providing concrete proof beyond vague assertions. 

The judgment observed that a plea of adverse possession must be specific and cannot be introduced for the first time during the appellate stage. The court also underscored the contradictory nature of claiming independent title and adverse possession simultaneously. 

Moreover, the court clarified that a welfare state cannot invoke adverse possession to claim land owned by its citizens. “The State cannot claim the land of its citizens by way of adverse possession as it is a welfare State,” the court noted. 

This verdict holds significance for cases involving adverse possession claims, particularly when government property is concerned. The court’s ruling reaffirms the importance of providing clear and compelling evidence to establish adverse possession claims, especially in cases involving public land.

This judgment reaffirms the judicial stance on adverse possession, reinforcing the need for solid and concrete evidence to substantiate such claims.

Date of Decision: August 9, 2023                      

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA & ANR.  VS JOSEPH AND OTHERS               

       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/09-Aug-2023_Govt_Kerala_Vs_Joseph.pdf"]

Latest Legal News