Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Acquittal - Husband Walks Free as Supreme Court Questions Reliability of Dying Declaration

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on November 2, 2023, the Supreme Court acquitted a man previously convicted of abetting his wife’s suicide, citing serious doubts about the authenticity of the dying declaration which formed the crux of the prosecution’s case.

The apex court, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal, overturned the earlier verdict, emphasizing that, “If the conviction is to be based only on the dying declaration, necessarily, it must be of an unimpeachable quality.”

The case involved the appellant, Shambhubhai Kalabhai Raval, who was convicted under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly instigating his wife to commit suicide. The deceased wife had set herself on fire after a decade of marriage. The prosecution’s argument hinged on a dying declaration that was recorded under questionable circumstances, lacking a doctor’s fitness endorsement and contradicted by the panchnama recorded shortly after.

The bench expressed concern over the prosecution’s decision to withhold a key witness, stating, “The prosecution has not explained why the evidence of this material witness was withheld from the Court.”

Highlighting the inconsistencies in the presented evidence, the judgment read, “These factors taken together create a serious doubt about the correctness of the dying declaration.”

As a result of these combined doubts, the court ruled that “the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt.” This landmark judgment underscores the court’s stance on the necessity for incontrovertible evidence when adjudicating matters of such grave consequence.

The bail bond of Raval, who was on bail, has been cancelled following the acquittal, and the appeal allowed on the terms laid out by the Supreme Court. This case raises important questions about the weight of dying declarations and the standard of proof required for convictions in criminal law.

Date of Decision: November 02, 2023

SHAMBHUBHAI KALABHAI RAVAL VS STATE OF GUJARAT   

Latest Legal News