Allahabad High Court Prohibited Two Advocates From Entering Premises and Restrained From Practicing Law and Bar Association expelled Both Advocates
The Allahabad High Court has taken decisive action against misconduct by legal professionals within court premises, emphasizing the enforcement of judicial integrity. Advocates Ran Vijay Singh and Mohd. Asif have been specifically targeted by the court for their disruptive behaviors, leading to significant restrictions on their legal practices.
The core legal issue in this judgment pertains to the enforcement of judicial decorum and professional conduct within the judiciary. The court utilized its authority under Chapter XXIV Rule 11(2) of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, to address serious breaches of conduct by the advocates.
During the proceedings of Original Suit No.25 of 2022 at the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj, the involved advocates led a group that not only disrupted the ongoing hearing but also escalated to physical assaults on litigants and threats to the Presiding Officer. This resulted in the High Court’s scrutiny over the conduct of these lawyers and the security protocols within court premises.
On Professional Conduct of Lawyers: Highlighting the inappropriate actions of Ran Vijay Singh and Mohd. Asif, the court expressed deep concerns about their behavior, which it described as a serious challenge to the judicial system’s functioning.
On Security Measures: The judgment calls for tightened security measures, instructing the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to ensure adequate protection in the courts to prevent future incidents.
On Restriction of Practice: Reflecting the severity of the misconduct, the court has imposed strict bans on both advocates from entering the District Judgeship premises at Allahabad and from practicing law across Uttar Pradesh.
Notices of contempt were issued to both advocates, questioning their eligibility for continuing legal practice given their conduct. The court also demanded a comprehensive investigation, including a review of CCTV footage, to potentially identify and reprimand other involved parties.
Date of Decision: April 30, 2024
In Re vs. Ranvijay Singh And Others
