Madras High Court Upholds Tamil Language Test for Group-IV Recruitment, Validates Government’s Language Proficiency Policy
In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has upheld the Tamil Nadu government’s mandate requiring a compulsory Tamil language paper for the Group-IV Combined Civil Services Examination. The decision, delivered by Justice G.R. Swaminathan, dismissed writ petitions filed by S. Nithesh and others challenging the notification, emphasizing that proficiency in Tamil is essential for efficient public service delivery in the state.
The writ petitions (Nos. 13034 & 13038 of 2024) challenged G.O. Ms. No. 133 and the consequential notification No. 1 of 2024 regarding the Tamil Nadu Combined Civil Services (Group-IV Services) Examination. The petitioners contended that the requirement of a Tamil language eligibility-cum-scoring test unfairly disadvantaged non-Tamil medium students and amounted to a de facto reservation for Tamil medium candidates.
Language Proficiency in Public Service: The court observed that proficiency in Tamil is crucial for Group-IV posts, which require direct interaction with the public. “The policy ensures that candidates selected for public service roles can effectively communicate and perform their duties,” the court stated. The stipulation of passing the Tamil language test with a minimum of 40% marks was found to be consistent with Section 21A of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016.
Constitutional and Legal Grounds: Justice Swaminathan emphasized that the Tamil language requirement did not constitute 100% reservation for Tamil medium candidates but was a measure to ensure language competency. “The requirement is in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016, and does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India,” the judgment noted.
Petitioners’ Arguments and Court’s Rebuttal: The petitioners argued that considering marks from the Tamil eligibility test for overall ranking disadvantaged non-Tamil medium candidates. The court found this contention without merit, affirming that the evaluation of both the Tamil eligibility and general studies papers is necessary to ensure candidates meet the required language competency standards. “The employer’s policy decisions regarding recruitment qualifications should not be interfered with unless shown to be illegal or ultra vires,” the court held.
The judgment extensively discussed the principles of evaluating recruitment qualifications and policy decisions by the government. “The stipulation of a Tamil language paper with a minimum qualifying mark ensures that all selected candidates possess the necessary language skills required for effective public service,” the court stated. The policy was deemed a legitimate exercise of the government’s power to prescribe qualifications for public service posts.
Justice Swaminathan remarked, “The requirement for candidates to pass the Tamil language test ensures they can effectively serve the public, which is a sine qua non for efficient discharge of their functions and duties.”
The dismissal of the writ petitions reinforces the judiciary’s stance on upholding the government’s policy decisions aimed at ensuring efficient public service delivery. By validating the Tamil language requirement, the judgment underscores the importance of language proficiency in public administration and sets a precedent for future recruitment policies.
Date of Decision: 30th May 2024
Nithesh & Others vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & Others
