Senior Citizens Act Authorizes Eviction, But Competing Claims Must Be Considered: Patna HC
In a significant ruling, the Patna High Court clarified the authority of the Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to order eviction, stating that such authority exists but should be exercised with caution. The judgement emphasized that the summary procedure under the Act aims to protect senior citizens from harassment and ensure speedy relief. However, the court underlined that the remedy of eviction must be granted after considering the competing claims in the dispute.
“Summary procedure under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 may have the authority to order eviction, but this remedy can only be granted after adverting to the competing claims in the dispute,” the bench stated.
The case involved a complex dispute over property rights and maintenance between a senior citizen and her children, governed by the Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act).
The judgement highlighted the need to harmonize the provisions of both statutes, as they serve distinct purposes. The Senior Citizens Act aims to provide a speedy and inexpensive remedy to senior citizens, while the PWDV Act addresses gender discrimination and social inequities in a patriarchal society.
“In deference to the dominant purpose of both the legislations, it would be appropriate for a Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to grant remedies of maintenance that do not result in obviating competing remedies under other special statutes, such as the PWDV Act, 2005,” the court emphasized.
The court also warned against misusing the summary procedure under the Senior Citizens Act to defeat legitimate claims, protecting the interests and welfare of senior citizens.
“We do not believe that it is the statutory intent that the harassment to a senior citizen should continue while the Tribunal is flooded with some evidence or the other only to prolong or delay matters,” the bench stated.
The ruling has garnered attention from legal experts, who see it as a landmark judgement defining the scope and limitations of the Tribunal’s authority under the Senior Citizens Act. The court’s guidance on harmonizing competing claims under different statutes will have implications for similar cases in the future.
The case was remanded back to the lower court for fresh adjudication, allowing the parties to present their objections and written statements. The court provided a timeline for the hearing, stressing the importance of timely proceedings and adherence to due process.
This ruling is expected to serve as a precedent for future cases involving competing claims and the eviction of children from property under the Senior Citizens Act.
Date of Decision: 31 July 2023
Anil Prakash vs The State of Bihar
