Supreme Court Suspends Sentence in Section 376D IPC Case – Victim’s Voluntary Actions
In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India granted a significant reprieve to the appellant, Yasheed @ Rasheed, by suspending his sentence in a case involving Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The decision, rendered on 22nd September 2023 by a bench comprising HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR, came after the High Court’s refusal to suspend his sentence.
The case revolved around Yasheed @ Rasheed and a juvenile co-accused who were alleged to have committed an offence under Section 376D IPC. What made this case peculiar was that the victim, a major, had reportedly gone of her own volition with both the accused and was restored back a week later. Initially, in her statement, she did not allege rape. However, four days later, she made such allegations in the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Trial Court’s findings also indicated that the victim had voluntarily gone with the accused persons.
In light of these circumstances, the Supreme Court observed, “Having regard to all these circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that the sentence of the present appellant should be suspended and he be released on bail, subject to such terms and conditions as the Trial Court may impose. One such condition shall be the requirement of his having to report on a weekly basis to the concerned Police Station.”
This decision emphasizes the importance of considering the specific circumstances of a case when deciding on the suspension of a sentence, particularly in cases involving serious offences like Section 376D IPC. The Court’s ruling underscores the need for a balanced approach, taking into account all relevant factors.
The Supreme Court has requested the High Court to expedite the appeal process, with a clear indication that its observations in this order should not be construed as reflecting on the merits of the case.
The appellant was represented by Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR, and Mr. Manan Daga, Adv., while the respondent, the State of Rajasthan, was represented by Mrs. Preeti Thanvi, Adv., Mr. Anand Shankar, AOR, and Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv.
This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in ensuring fair and just outcomes, even in cases with complex and sensitive circumstances.
Date of Decision: 22nd SEPTEMBER 2023
YASHEED @ RASHEED vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
