Section 207 Cr.P.C. Mandates Only the Supply of Documents Relied Upon by the Prosecution – Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Limitation on Access to ‘Unrelied Upon’ Documents
In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has clarified the scope of document disclosure under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). The court dismissed a petition seeking access to documents listed as ‘unrelied upon’ by the prosecution in a criminal case involving the petitioner, Kalyani Singh.
Legal Point of the Judgement:
The central legal issue in this case revolved around the interpretation of Section 207 Cr.P.C., which concerns the provision of documents to the accused. The petitioner contended that all documents seized, including those not relied upon by the prosecution, should be made available to her to ensure a fair trial.
Facts and Issues:
The petitioner, Kalyani Singh, challenged an order from the Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh, which denied her application for access to certain documents described in the seizure memo but marked as ‘unrelied upon’ by the prosecution. She argued that these documents were essential for her defense and contended that their withholding violated her right to a fair trial.
Court’s Detailed Assessment:
Scope of Section 207 Cr.P.C.: Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul noted that Section 207 serves to inform the accused of evidence that will be used against them, preventing surprises during the trial. However, it does not extend to documents that the prosecution does not intend to rely on.
Supreme Court Precedents: Referencing the Supreme Court’s directive in “In Re: To Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies And Deficiencies In Criminal Trials,” the High Court observed that while transparency is critical, it does not necessitate the provision of all seized documents at the pre-trial stage.
Right to Access Documents: The court pointed out that documents deemed ‘unrelied upon’ by the prosecution could be requested under Section 91 Cr.P.C. during the trial, but not at the stage of framing charges.
Protection of Investigation Integrity: The judgment emphasized the importance of safeguarding sensitive information, such as the identities of informants and the integrity of the ongoing investigation, which justified restrictions on the disclosure of certain documents.
Decision: The High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the lower court’s decision that the prosecution need only supply documents it relies upon. Documents classified as ‘unrelied upon’ remain undisclosed at the pre-trial stage.
Date of Decision: April 25, 2024
Kalyani Singh Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Chandigarh
