Rule 15 Imposes Liability Only When Placement Agency Fails To Perform, Causing Monetary Loss to JSBCL: Jharkhand HC Reads Down Excise Rule
The Jharkhand High Court, in a landmark judgment, has clarified the contentious Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022. The Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan, held that the Rule imposes liability on a placement agency only when it fails to perform its duties within its scope, leading to a monetary loss to JSBCL.
Brief on Legal Point of Judgement: The court opined that Rule 15 should be read down to mean the liability of the placement agency is confined to its scope of work and subject to the principles of natural justice.
Facts and Issues: Several placement agencies challenged the validity of Rule 15, arguing it unfairly penalized them for shortfalls in Minimum Guaranteed Revenue (MGR), regardless of their actual performance or control over liquor sales.
Detailed Court Assessment:
Viability of Subordinate Legislation: Upholding Rule 15 in principle, the court emphasized the intra vires nature of subordinate legislation, stating it should conform to the parent statute and constitutional principles.
Contractual Obligations and Excise Act Compliance: The obligations under the agreement and rules should align with the legislative framework of the Jharkhand Excise Act and uphold constitutional values.
Penalty Imposition and Natural Justice: The court emphasized that penalties under Rule 15 should be imposed only after establishing a placement agency’s non-performance and causing a monetary loss to JSBCL, ensuring adherence to natural justice.
Reading Down Rule 15: The court read down Rule 15, limiting the penalizing of placement agencies to cases of non-performance causing monetary loss to JSBCL.
Decision: The court allowed all writ petitions, directing that Rule 15 be read down to limit its scope. It was clarified that placement agencies are liable only when their non-performance leads to monetary loss. The court also provided relief to Urmila International Services Pvt. Ltd. by quashing its Earnest Money Deposit forfeiture, with liberty to JSBCL to initiate fresh proceedings if necessary.
Date of Decision: April 9, 2024
Urmila International Services Pvt. Ltd. & Others v. Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Ltd. & Others
