Telangana High Court Orders Closure of Rowdy Sheet Against Petitioner, Cites Lack of Grounds
In a significant judgment, the Telangana High Court, presided over by HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, has ordered the closure of a rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, Mothukuri Yerraiah Yerrababu. The judgment, delivered on 29 September 2023, declared the action of the respondents as “illegal” and “arbitrary,” emphasizing the importance of constitutional rights.
The petitioner had challenged the continuation of the rowdy sheet, alleging that it was in violation of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and causing him undue inconvenience and hardship in leading a respectable life.
“While initiating proceedings for opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the year 2019, the respondents police have taken into consideration the bound over cases which were registered against the petitioner in the years 2013 and 2015.”
The Court also referred to precedent, including the case of B. SATYANARAYANA REDDY vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, which highlighted the requirement that at least two or more cases should be registered against a person to classify them as a habitual offender.
The judgment highlighted the absence of allegations relating to a breach of peace or public tranquility by the petitioner after the opening of the rowdy sheet. The Court stressed that the basis for opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner was the bound over cases registered in 2013 and 2015. Furthermore, the Court noted that there had been no convictions in the subsequent cases registered in 2017 and 2019.
The judgment also addressed the statutory nature of A.P. Police Standing Orders, emphasizing that they do not invest police officers with powers beyond those specifically conferred under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, or other enactments.
In conclusion, the Telangana High Court directed the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, stating:
“There was no sufficient ground to term the petitioner as a ‘habitual offender’ under Clause (A) of Order 601 of A.P. Police Manual.”
The Court further added that if the petitioner is involved in any future crimes and if there is sufficient material to establish the need to prevent his movements, the respondents are at liberty to take action against him, but strictly in accordance with the Standing Orders of A.P. Police Manual.
This judgment serves as a significant reminder of the need to balance individual rights and law enforcement, with the Court upholding the petitioner’s rights and ensuring that the rowdy sheet was closed on the basis of insufficient grounds.
Date of Decision: 29 September 2023
Mothukuri Yerraiah Yerrababu vs State of Telengana
