Suspension Not Effective Without Vice-Chancellor’s Approval; Recovery of Overpaid Salary Set Aside: Delhi HC

99
0
Share:
fir bail transport pay Public T20 World Cup v Pay Video School company Human Rape Sexual Taxable Evidence Tax Statement property students Policy Bail Bail cheques Police Accident Service Claim Trademark Cognizance smuggling NI Eviction Agreement Minister Acid spa Old Delhi HC MBBS DivorceLand Child Evidence Bail Senior Marriage Maintenance Application Property Exam Evidence Divorce doctrine pocso award Medical public Income Tax constable National bailUniversity Property Recovery Evidence Adopted v Payment territorial corporation Bail liability police bank Constitutionality child nature claim domestic Limitation bsnl traffic property railway legal landlords Relationship Citizen property Tax custody phonetic predicate Acquisition forum public asset tax wire eligibility violence physical financial second trademark person Corpus Director TDS policy entertainment parody games recovery 14 tax judiciary claims court bar 34 Raps advertisement employees salary mother rape decisions students 138 divorce bail CBI fir evidence evidence eviction drc lower doctors legal investigation civil copyright

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court emphasized that a faculty member’s suspension from a university position is not valid without the express approval of the Vice-Chancellor. The Court further clarified the illegality of recovering overpaid salary when such suspension is not formally in effect.

The case involved Dr. Amit Kumar, an Assistant Professor at Bharati College, University of Delhi. Following allegations of sexual harassment, he was placed on forced leave, leading to a compulsory retirement. An audit revealed an overpayment of Rs. 6,42,131 in salary, which the college sought to recover. The primary issues addressed were the legality of this recovery and the validity of Kumar’s suspension and entitlements.

Justice Chandra Dhari Singh examined the procedural aspects of Kumar’s suspension. The Court noted that while the Governing Body recommended the suspension, it lacked formal approval from the Vice-Chancellor at the time of the audit and recovery order. This lack of approval rendered the suspension and subsequent recovery of overpaid salary legally untenable.

Regarding salary and increments, the Court established that Kumar had duly received all his increments until his forced leave commenced in February 2018. Under UGC guidelines, entitlements like travel allowance or additional increments are not applicable during leave or suspension.

The Delhi High Court ruled that the order for recovery of the overpaid salary amounting to Rs. 6,42,131 was unjustified, as the suspension was not in effect at the time of payment. However, the Court denied the petitioner’s claim for additional increments.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2023

Dr. Amit Kumar vs Bharati College

Download Judgment

Share: