Supreme Court Stays Conviction of Rahul Gandhi – Lack of Reasons for Maximum Sentence”
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has granted interim relief to Rahul Gandhi, staying his conviction in a criminal case. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar on 4th August 2023.
The case in question pertains to Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 8644/2023 filed by Rahul Gandhi against the impugned judgment and order dated 7th July 2023 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The High Court had dismissed the revision petition filed by Rahul Gandhi, challenging the order of the learned Sessions Judge, which rejected his prayer for stay of conviction.
The Court noted that the Trial Judge had awarded the maximum sentence of two years’ imprisonment to Rahul Gandhi without providing any reasons for such a decision. This raised concerns as it triggered the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, which can result in disqualification from public office.
“Though the learned Appellate Court and the learned High Court have spent voluminous pages while rejecting the application for stay of conviction, these aspects have not even been touched in their orders,” the Court observed in its judgment.
Furthermore, the Court emphasized the importance of restraint in public speeches for individuals in public life, referring to previous proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in contempt cases. However, it noted that the absence of reasons for imposing the maximum sentence of two years required consideration.
“We are of the considered view that the ramification of subsection (3) of Section 8 of the Act are wide-ranging. They not only affect the right of the appellant to continue in public life but also affect the right of the electorate, who have elected him, to represent their constituency,” the Court stated.
Taking into account the potential consequences and the lack of reasons for the maximum sentence, the Supreme Court stayed the order of conviction during the pendency of the appeal. It, however, clarified that the pendency of the appeal would not hinder the Appellate Court from proceeding further with the appeal on its merits.
“The parties would be at liberty to approach the learned Appellate Court for expeditious disposal of the appeal, which request would be considered by it, on its own merits,” the Court added.
The stay on Rahul Gandhi’s conviction has sparked discussions and debates among legal experts and political commentators, given the significance of the case in terms of its impact on public officeholders. The Appellate Court will now proceed with the appeal to decide on the merits of the case in due course.
Date of Decision: 04-08-2023
RAHUL GANDHI vs PURNESH ISHWARBHAI MODI & ANR.
