Preservation of Status Quo Paramount in Property Disputes: Delhi High Court in Gali Ownership Battle
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, presided by Justice Shalinder Kaur, overturned the decision of the Trial Court that allowed the installation of an iron gate in a disputed common gali (lane), emphasizing the importance of maintaining the status quo in property disputes.
Brief on Legal Point of Judgment
The legal crux of this judgment revolves around the petition under Article 227 for setting aside the Trial Court’s order that permitted Nalanda Modern Public School to install a gate on the disputed gali, thus engaging issues of ownership and the preservation of status quo under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Facts and Issues in the Judgment
The petitioners, heirs of one of the original shareowners of the disputed property, challenged the respondents’ (school authorities) claim over the gali. The respondents argued the need for the gate for security purposes in the school premises. The pivotal issue was whether the respondents’ actions of constructing a gate complied with the status quo order and respected the mutual rights over the common passage.
Court’s Assessment on Legal Points and Issues
Justice Kaur meticulously analyzed the case’s history and the orders passed. She observed, “The admitted position is that the status quo order is still continuing…” and noted that the security concerns raised by the school were not substantiated adequately as the issue was never raised prior to 2021.
The Court found that the Trial Court’s order permitting the gate installation was contradictory to the existing status quo order. It was emphasized that any modification to the property should not disturb the delicate balance of rights maintained until the dispute’s resolution.
Decision of Judgment
The High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order allowing the installation of the iron gate, citing lack of substantial reasoning related to the safety concerns and the violation of the status quo order. However, the court did not interfere with the decision to level the gali, noting the petitioners’ no objection to this aspect.
Date of Decision : March 27, 2024.
Sh. Sat Narain & Anr vs. Nalanda Modern Public School & Ors
