Politically Motivated Allegations Don’t Hold Up in Court: Allahabad High Court Quashed Proceedings Under SCST Act
The Allahabad High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings against Amit Kumar Singh in a case involving alleged caste-based abuses and threats. The court found the allegations to be politically motivated and lacking sufficient evidence. This decision underscores the necessity of thorough judicial scrutiny and the importance of credible evidence in cases involving serious charges under the SC/ST Act.
Background:
Amit Kumar Singh, a student of Hotel Management in Sydney, Australia, was accused by Gola of caste-based abuses, threats, and assault. The allegations were said to be driven by a political rivalry involving the village Pradhan, Shiv Shanker Singh. The complainant, Gola, claimed that Amit Kumar Singh and his associates had physically assaulted him and issued threats. However, a police inquiry and previous judicial orders revealed contradictions and a lack of credible evidence, suggesting that the allegations were fabricated.
Court Observations:
Lack of Credible Evidence: The court’s analysis found significant inconsistencies in the complainant’s statements and the evidence presented. A police report concluded that the complaint was motivated by political rivalry and not based on factual events. “The proceedings are based on fabricated facts and political motivations,” the court noted, referencing the police findings that discredited the complainant’s claims.
Contradictory Statements and Judicial Application of Mind: The court criticized the judicial process for failing to apply proper scrutiny before issuing the summoning order. “The learned Magistrate did not consider the material available before him and relied solely on the contents of the complaint,” observed the court. The summoning order was found to lack detailed reasoning and did not adequately scrutinize the evidence.
Legal Reasoning: The judgment emphasized the principles set by the Supreme Court for evaluating evidence in cases under the SC/ST Act. The court reiterated that for an offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act to be valid, the incident must occur in a place within public view, and there must be an evident intention to humiliate based on caste. “In the present case, the incident took place inside the complainant’s house without public view, thus not fulfilling the requirements for offences under the SC/ST Act,” the court stated.
Justice Shamim Ahmed remarked, “The allegations were found to be politically motivated and driven by personal rivalry. The judicial mind was not adequately applied by the Magistrate in the summoning order, which is a serious matter.”
Decision: The Allahabad High Court’s decision to quash the criminal proceedings against Amit Kumar Singh reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to preventing the misuse of legal provisions, particularly those under the SC/ST Act. This judgment highlights the necessity for thorough evidence evaluation and proper judicial application of mind when taking cognizance of criminal cases. The ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases, ensuring that allegations driven by ulterior motives are adequately scrutinized to uphold justice.
Date of Decision: May 29, 2024
Amit Kumar Singh vs. Gola and Another
