PH High Court Grants Bail in Cyber-Crime Case, Imposes Stringent Conditions: Balancing Liberty and Fair Trial
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh granted bail to the petitioner, Arjun Sain, in a cyber-crime case. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, sets a precedent by imposing stringent conditions to ensure a balance between the accused’s liberty and the need for a fair trial.
The petitioner, Arjun Sain, had filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), seeking release upon his arrest in FIR No. 0033 dated 03.09.2022, which involved various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Information Technology Act.
In a notable statement from the judgment, the Court emphasized its duty to evaluate the accused’s role in the case and other circumstances before deciding bail applications. Quoting the case of Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P., the Court affirmed that criminal antecedents alone cannot be the sole basis for rejecting bail.
Considering the serious nature of cyber-crime charges and the petitioner’s criminal history, the Court took measures to address potential concerns. However, the judgment asserted that further pre-trial incarceration at this stage would not be justifiable, given that the co-accused were already out on bail.
To safeguard the investigation and prevent any possible tampering with evidence, the Court imposed various stringent conditions. The petitioner was required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten thousand (INR 10,000/-) and a surety of Rs. Twenty-five thousand (INR 25,000/-).
In a pioneering move, the Court also directed the petitioner to keep only one prepaid SIM card and disconnect all other mobile numbers within fifteen days of release from prison. The Court justified this restriction by acknowledging the exponential growth in technology and the need to minimize reliance on surety.
In the judgment, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara emphasized the importance of expedited trials in cyber-crime cases. He warned against a potential upsurge in cyber-thuggee and urged the trial court to make all endeavors to conclude the proceedings promptly.
The judgment received praise for its balanced approach in protecting the rights of the accused while ensuring a fair trial. Legal experts applauded the Court’s progressive stance in acknowledging the technological advancements and the need to minimize impersonation in identification techniques.
Date of Decision: 4th August 2023
Arjun Sain vs State of U.T (Chandigarh)
